I've been researching about why one might add an acid or a base to the mobile phase in HPLC (reverse phase in the example I'm looking at). I was hoping someone could help me resolve some conflicting explanations I've encountered.
Consider a mixture you would like to analyse by reverse phase HPLC - hence the stationary phase is non-polar and your mobile phase will be the more polar option*. This mixture contains acids (HA) and bases (B). Consider adding an acid, which I will call H-X, to the mobile phase.
The acidic mobile phase will mean the acid analyte, H-A, will remain largely protonated, and thus neutral. The basic analyte, will be deprotonated, B-, and thus ionic. Hence the neutral analyte, HA, will be retained on the non-polar column for longer than the polar/ionic B-, which will elute first.
This all makes sense to me. However other sources seem to say that if you were to add an acid, H-X, to a mixture with a basic compound, B, the two will make an ion-pair, i.e. (HB)+(X)-, which will overall be electrically neutral and thus interact with the reverse phase column more than if the base were left alone.
So does it make sense to add acid when it seems to encourage both analytes to interact with the reverse phase column more?
And another thing: in the example above, there are reasons for the increased interactions. However, it seems to me that in general, a small percentage of acid is added to HPLc mobile phase as a matter of course. When I try to find out why I just get pages saying stuff like 'it improves peak shape' etc, but providing very little imformation on how adding acid to everything helps in all cases. Can anyone point me in the right direction on this?
I realize I may have asked the same questions 2 times without really understanding it. Well, I'm here to learn, right?
* I realize y'all would known this anyway, I'm just being clear for the benefit of less experienced readers who may be looking at this post.