[heller]

Hi Everybody,

I am a physicist student from England. I found a site with the following title:

Particle and atomic physics
- instead of theories -
according to experimental
results and laws of the
classical physics by
Gabor Fekete

Please view this site at www.physics.uw.hu address.

[P]

Hi Heller,

I'm sure it's quite interesting but I can't plough through it - the English is painfully poor along with the sentence structure.   Example of one randomly selected paragraph:
 

  "The origin of the mass m = 9.1×10-31kg elementary objects respectively the my opinion is it that those are not others, like a till now thougth elementary particles and by this not are discovered, from the cathode or anode altogether only charged particles taking over, mainly negative ion-charactered, chemically neutral, from roentgen-photons and photons particles costructing up, amounting to the millionth constituent parts amounting to the atmosphere of Earth, extraordinarily easy gas atom. This my reasoning build on till nows and followings, then in the following part I shall to verify with experimental results and calculatings."

Does this make sense to anyone??   I may be acting thick and I may just be missing the point, but I can't follow this properly with such incoherent ramble.   Anyway - it's not suprising JJ Thompson got some things slightly wrong (when was it 100 - 200 years ago??) -  scientific theory is always being updated and mistakes corrected. 

Hell - I could say that JJ Thompson was a bad scientist for saying atoms are like plumb puddings  -  but it was a ground breaking revelation at the time and he was partially right anyway (he came up with the theory that the atom was made of positive and negative bits) -  Niels Bohr then updated his theory etc..  ect..   etc..

sorry to diss it but..  it's just really hard to read, let alone understand. 

[Borek]

I suppose you have to be fluent in Hungarian to understand this English.

[Donaldson Tan]

I really want to comment on Hellar's site but the English is incomprehensible.