June 29, 2024, 03:34:49 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Equilibrium #2  (Read 3740 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cheistrynoob768

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-3
Equilibrium #2
« on: October 19, 2013, 01:21:35 AM »
Question 4: http://imgur.com/Wa4BkSk

My Work: http://imgur.com/MTQNR8M

I scratched a lot of things off by mistake and I bubbled the answer I got which was wrong, I felt like I did everything I could but the correct answer is actually 0.0132 mol.

Offline magician4

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 567
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-11
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2013, 10:08:08 AM »
from what I can decipher from your attempts , your initial error beginns here :
[tex][HI]_{eq.}^2 = \left( \frac {0.120}{0.5} \right)^2 = \color{red}{ 0.0576 \neq 0.21}  [/tex]

... though this is irrelevant, as you can't calculate [HI]eq. in this manner from c0(HI)

a much better idea would be to set up a LMA expression, and fill in what you know:

[tex] K_c = \frac {[H_2] \cdot [I_2]}{[HI]^2} = \frac { x \cdot x }{(c_0(HI) - 2x)^2} = 2 \cdot 10^{-2}[/tex]

resolve for x , calculate n(I2) thereof


regards

Ingo
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
(Douglas Adams)

Offline Cheistrynoob768

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-3
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2013, 11:56:09 PM »
I tried again but I think I've gone somewhere wrong with my math,

0.0200 = x^2/(0.0576-2x)^2

0.0048 = x / 0.0576-2x

0.0048(0.0576-2x) = x

2.7648E-4 - 0.0096x = x

2.7648E-4 = 1.0096x

x = 2.73851E-4

When I tried to get the moles, I did 2.73851E-4 * 0.5 = 1.369255E-4 moles which is still wrong...

Offline magician4

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 567
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-11
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2013, 09:05:50 AM »
[tex]0.056 \neq c_0(HI)[/tex]

that's the source of your error


regards

Ingo
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
(Douglas Adams)

Offline Cheistrynoob768

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-3
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2013, 03:10:07 PM »
I am still stuck then, I tried all I could really.

Offline magician4

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 567
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-11
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2013, 03:31:33 PM »
ok, step by step..

what's your initial concentration c0 for HI due to the original task ?
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
(Douglas Adams)

Offline Cheistrynoob768

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-3
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2013, 08:36:27 PM »
0.0576 mol/L?

Offline magician4

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 567
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-11
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2013, 10:42:29 PM »
if you have an in intial amount of n = 0.120 moles in V = 500 mL , what concentration does this result in?
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
(Douglas Adams)

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7978
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2013, 10:07:01 AM »
This is the reaction with Δn=0 hence you can use moles instead of concentrations. This approach will give you moles of iodine directly.
AWK

Offline Vicktor

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Equilibrium #2
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2013, 12:38:51 PM »
What did you come up with on your final answer? I calculated it out a bit differently using the quadratic formula. I also noticed your x2 disappeared?

Sponsored Links