July 08, 2024, 09:06:01 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11  (Read 4617 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SodiumBicarbonate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« on: January 31, 2014, 09:19:08 AM »
Hello,

I don't understand the solution of McMurry 8e, problem 11.11.

The problem is to rank the following substances in order of their expected SN1 reactivity:

CH3CH2Br
H2C=CHCH(Br)CH3
H2C=CHBr
CH3CH(Br)CH3

And the answer is:

H2C=CHCH(Br)CH3 > CH3CH(Br)CH3 > CH3CH2Br > H2C=CHBr

But why?

It's a matter of carbocation stability, of course, and it obviously relates to the attached image, which appears in the book right before this problem. So I do understand why CH3CH(Br)CH3 > CH3CH2Br (secondary vs. primary) and why H2C=CHCH(Br)CH3 > CH3CH2Br (allylic vs. primary), but I don't understand why H2C=CHCH(Br)CH3 > CH3CH(Br)CH3 or why H2C=CHBr is the least stable.

I admit I'm more concerned about having missed something in the book, than simply not knowing organic chemistry well enough... I mean, there will always be things I won't know, but if I should have known how to solve this problem and I don't, then that's a problem.

Please help.

Thanks!

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2014, 09:28:22 AM »
H2C=CHCH(Br)CH3 dissociation of bromine, will produce a carbocation that is both secondary and in alylic position in regards to the double bond while the carbocation of CH3CH(Br)CH3 is only secondary (no resonance with a double bond). Also, there is no resonance stabilization in vinyl carbocations. You should review the resonance topic.

Offline SodiumBicarbonate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2014, 09:41:15 AM »
Thanks, Raderford, I get what you're saying about H2C=CHCH(Br)CH3.
But I still don't understand why H2C=CHBr is the least stable. I mean, right, there's no resonance, but there's no resonance stabilizing the carbocation of CH3CH2Br too, so it can't be the whole explanation.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2014, 10:07:06 AM »
You can look at it this way: the formed carbocation will be sp hybridized, there is a 50% s orbital character of the sp hybrid orbital where the positive charge will be accommodated. As s orbital is closer to the nucleus, and positive repels positive the positive charge on a sp C atom will cause higher energy to that carbocation, than the positive charge accommodated on the sp2 C atom of the ethyl carbocation.

Offline SodiumBicarbonate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2014, 10:33:09 AM »
What do you mean by "sp hybrid orbital where the positive charge will be accommodated"? The only positively charged thing is the nucleus, isn't it?

If I get what's going on, both sp orbitals will be fully occupied, as well as one of the the two p orbitals (the one forming the π bond). The remaining p orbital will remain empty. Why is it less stable than three fully occupied sp2 orbitals?

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2014, 11:02:36 AM »
I tried to make analogy with carboanion stabilization regarding hybridization, but I see it doesn't make too much sense.

What can you conclude from the comparison of the hyperconjugation stabilization in the two carbocations?

Offline SodiumBicarbonate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2014, 11:07:34 AM »
Oh, I think I get it. With three σ bonds we have more electrons interacting with the empty p orbital, thus stabilizing it?

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2014, 11:40:51 AM »
Right.

Offline SodiumBicarbonate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: McMurry 8e, problem 11.11
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2014, 11:41:57 AM »
Great, I really appreciate your help, thanks!  :)

Sponsored Links