December 23, 2024, 06:08:33 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Transetherification Problem  (Read 6084 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline darkdevil

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-2
Transetherification Problem
« on: December 18, 2013, 08:38:41 AM »
Hi, I tried to perform the following transetherification with the below conditions. But after 20hours I get a mixture of products. Can I do the transetherification with an aldehyde group present? What other better ways do you suggest so that can I get my product?



Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2013, 08:52:57 AM »
Those sorts of conditions look more like acetalisation ones to me. ArOMe  :rarrow: ArOH is usually done with things like BBr3 in my experience, but imagine that may play merry havoc with the aldehyde - is there any protecting group in Greene and Wuts (or equivalent) that is stable to this?

Do you have to start with the methoxy? The free phenol seems cheap enough, see e.g. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/h19808?lang=en&region=GB

Offline darkdevil

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-2
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2013, 09:17:01 AM »
I also wonder before if I shall use the phenol form to perform ullmann ether synthesis. I bought some already, but is it really no luck for the above reaction?

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2013, 10:00:10 AM »
BBr3 also gives some bro inaction of the benzene ring. As sjb suggested starting from the phenol is worth a go.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline AlphaScent

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Mole Snacks: +24/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2013, 11:06:07 AM »
What is bro inaction?
If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the precipitate

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2013, 11:11:13 AM »
I also wonder before if I shall use the phenol form to perform ullmann ether synthesis. I bought some already, but is it really no luck for the above reaction?

It's not really an Ullmann, though is it? (Isn't this 2RX :rarrow: RR ?), the acidity of the phenol should be such that you can just use NaH and alkyl halide I think.


Offline AlphaScent

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Mole Snacks: +24/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2013, 11:13:17 AM »
SJB,

I think so aswell
If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the precipitate

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2013, 11:18:18 AM »
What is bro inaction?

Damm spelling checker, I was on the iPad. It should be bromination, sorry.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline webassignbuddy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 125
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2013, 11:19:09 AM »
oops wrong thread...

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2013, 11:20:56 AM »
I also wonder before if I shall use the phenol form to perform ullmann ether synthesis. I bought some already, but is it really no luck for the above reaction?

It's not really an Ullmann, though is it? (Isn't this 2RX :rarrow: RR ?), the acidity of the phenol should be such that you can just use NaH and alkyl halide I think.

I have done many phenolic alkylations on large scale, >200kgs, the best is really potassium carbonate, alkyl halide, phenol in refluxing acetone. Methods I have on this computer.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline AlphaScent

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Mole Snacks: +24/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2013, 11:26:54 AM »
Disco,

That seems like a good reaction.  Easy.  The Ullmann I believe the OP was referring to is a condensation.  Not the R-R type.  Both use copper, but from what I have just read, the condensation is done at high temperatures and is a bit fickle.

And if you have done this on 200 kilos or more.  Im taking that advice to the bank.

Thanks, now I get it.  Bromination.  I was reading and think I have never heard that term, bro inaction.  Its all for a good laugh, no worries.
If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the precipitate

Offline darkdevil

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-2
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2013, 11:28:08 AM »
I also wonder before if I shall use the phenol form to perform ullmann ether synthesis. I bought some already, but is it really no luck for the above reaction?

It's not really an Ullmann, though is it? (Isn't this 2RX :rarrow: RR ?), the acidity of the phenol should be such that you can just use NaH and alkyl halide I think.

I have done many phenolic alkylations on large scale, >200kgs, the best is really potassium carbonate, alkyl halide, phenol in refluxing acetone. Methods I have on this computer.

wow!! do u work in industries??  and does the condition you mentioned has good yield?  would it affect the aldehyde group within?  thank you so much all of you

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2013, 03:07:12 PM »
I think the aldehyde should be OK. Try it and see.
If it does not work protect it.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline darkdevil

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-2
Re: Transetherification Problem
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2014, 01:16:32 AM »
Those sorts of conditions look more like acetalisation ones to me. ArOMe  :rarrow: ArOH is usually done with things like BBr3 in my experience, but imagine that may play merry havoc with the aldehyde - is there any protecting group in Greene and Wuts (or equivalent) that is stable to this?

Do you have to start with the methoxy? The free phenol seems cheap enough, see e.g. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/h19808?lang=en&region=GB

Finally, I tried to use the phenol form and performed Ullman type condensation with an alkyl bromide in DMF. The reaction worked well and nearly 100% yield. Thanks

Sponsored Links