However, have you tried looking at DMI or DMPU as solvents?
Actually I did, and I found we have approx 100 mL of DMPU. The only clue here is that I don't know how do DMI and DMPU behave. The original procedure I mentioned above says that the reaction should be done in HMPA, then quenched with water, and mixture afterwards extracted repetitively with pentane. Does DMPU readily go into acqueous layer when the other layer is pentane? I checked the solvent miscibility chart, but these solvents are quite exotic and did not find any miscibility data..
I just performed a scifinder search on thiepane and I found a source that used EtOH as a solvent and they got a yield of 52%. However, I would be apprehensive using an alcohol as a solvent for the reaction, I would be concerned with the Na2S reacting with the ethanol. Not sure how likely this is.
Yes, I checked all the options before deciding for the one with polar aprotic solvents, and the procedure with ethanol (I think we're considering the same) is insane since it is done on a large scale and requires quite huge dilutions and runs over 5 days with daily additions of fresh Na
2S solution. By the way, once previously when I was preparing solution of Na
2S in methanol for some other reaction, I noticed that a large portion of some white curdy precipitate forms on the bottom of the flask. What kind of process happens here?
I have looked at the spectra and from what you have provided there seems to be a lot of the dibromo compound in there. Isolating it might be hard, but what does your TLC look like? How do the authors say to purify the compound? If they have a solvent system for column chromatography you may need to set up a gradient.
The authors add water in the flask at the end of reaction and afterwards do a series of extractions with pentane. They also use silica (I didn't understand if it was an ordinary column or a short plug) and mixture of chloroform:petrolether=1:9 as mobile phase.
I don't have petrolether in the lab, I suppose n-pentane or hexanes would do?
The TLC done in chloroform:pentane=1:8 gives two spots which smear really a lot (i.e. have long "parabolic" tails) and are separated clearly, but only for about 3-4 mm. There is also one smal residual spot that never moves from the baseline. I guess that moving spots are the sulfide and dibromo, but I really don't have idea which is which and don't know how to distinguish them. They both stain brown in KMnO
4.
Have you considered a typical reactive extraction? i.e. partition between DCM and mild aqueous acid to protonate the thiepane and force it into the aqueous layer, drain off the organic layer and dibromohexane, and then deprotonate the thiepane to return it to the organic layer.
EDIT: On second thought, you may need quite a bit of acid to force that reaction to take place...
Hmm, the issue in here is that most of HMPA goes into aqueous layer and I'm not sure how complicated it would be to return the sulfide back to pentane layer..
If your compound is low boiling you should definitely try a distillation like Kriggy suggested earlier.
If that doesn't work, play around with different mobile phases on TLC to see if you can find a system that gives you the desired separation. The change in the structure is substantial, so I can't imagine they have identical Rf's in all mobile phases. In general with difficult separations you don't want to go over the 3:1 (length:width) ratio. This is the ratio we use in our lab for "snowmen" spots on TLC and get pure products with little co-elution. A longer column does indeed give you better separation of the average/middle of each compound, but longer columns also spread out each compound as it travels down the column. The effect is that the very first bit of the first compound off the column is pure, but then you get a giant smear of both compounds followed by a pure second compound at the tail end.
That about smearing and spreading in longer column is the issue, I'm really not sure what to do since both compounds seem to be behaving quite similarly.