What could unstable possibly mean, in the case of an elemental cation?
nooo, i wrote
stable, not "unstable." but before i answer this let me answer this:
You'll have to give us the exact context of at least one of their statements, for the reasons I've highlighted above
(this was regarding my professors)
I can't provide any specific examples since i can't recall any. but basically for our O-chem class, we were predicting reactions for compounds with sodium in their formulae taking place in aqueous solution. I understood the steps that involved sodium becoming dissociated when you put the Na containing compound in water. But, i saw Na
+ as an H
+ equivalent (keep in mind this is when i was being exposed to O-chem for the first semester), so i asked my prof (multiple prof.s actually): why doesn't the Na
+ get reduced by the reducers and form a bond? they replied, the sodium cation is more stable due to the satisfied octet configuration.
Okay... so that's the full story.
You're also going to have to explain why you're asking this.
Well, here's what i really wanted to get at
i was wondering, if the sodium acetate formed was like this (bound):
or like this (bonded)
oh, ignore the hydration
-----------
here's my conundrum: i was taught that sodium cations generally didn't get reduced to form bonds. Okay then, but see when i mix vinegar and baking soda together, i definitely do see a solid (really just looks alot like the Na-bicarbonate i dumped in... but anyway..). but i've also learned aboutf solubilities. where, if your solutes (Na
+ and acetate
-) are polar in similar strengths with the solvent, then the solutes would be soluble.
Well...
my solute: Na
+ and acetate
- (all polar)
my solvent: water (pretty polar)
So then why is my "solute" not dissolving? I shouldn't be able to see as much solid as i do when i mix the acid and base ingredients.
ty so much arkcon!!