December 25, 2024, 12:27:09 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Calculation  (Read 3040 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Spacenova

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Calculation
« on: December 01, 2014, 10:38:35 AM »
I have a question. I want to calculate Glyceryl Trinitrate 1 % m/m assay. This is the description of assay:

http://lib.njutcm.edu.cn/yaodian/ep/EP5.0/16_monographs/monographs_d-k/Glyceryl%20trinitrate%20solution.pdf

How I get 60.8 in calculation?

Thank you.

« Last Edit: December 01, 2014, 11:06:12 AM by Spacenova »

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5715
  • Mole Snacks: +331/-24
Re: UV assay calculation
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2014, 10:39:31 AM »
It is a forum rule that you must show your attempt first, before we can help you.

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: UV assay calculation
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2014, 10:46:04 AM »
Even if it weren't a forum rule, how can we discover the answer, from the protocol?  Show us what you did, fill in the calculation with your observed values.  You may even solve it yourself just by looking at it.
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline Spacenova

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: UV assay calculation
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2014, 10:54:17 AM »
NaNO3 molar weight : 68.99. I thought as well it is molar weight.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2014, 12:51:32 PM by Spacenova »

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: UV assay calculation
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2014, 11:13:28 AM »
So you question really is, in the published expression: AT x mS x C / AR x mT x 60.8 x 100, where the 60.8 comes from?  That's sort of a fudge factor this sort of compendium use when they simplify the procedure for you.  You can certainly try to figure out how they got the fudge factor, if you feel the need (and have the time,) to learn more.  What does each factor stand for?  How do they all relate?  Do you recognize 60.8 -- is that a MW, or something like that?
« Last Edit: December 01, 2014, 07:46:26 PM by Arkcon »
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Sponsored Links