To put it brutally: fission is outfashioned and fusion will never work. Wind turbines make already cheaper electricity. We only need some rather easy development for electricity storage, and all will be over.
Then you have research on atomic nuclei, but I don't see new practical uses to it in a foreseeable future - I may be horribly wrong.
What we'll still need in the future are radionuclides, especially for medicine. I don't know how much R&D is still done for it, but it's certainly a matter of production costs, yields and transport delays, not of nuclei properties.
It would be absolutely fantastic to produce radionuclides without a nuclear reactor, and revertheless in decent amounts at decent cost, but my impression is that it would be seriously difficult, and that very little research is done presently on that topic because failure is probable.
There are practical uses of a somewhat related field: imaging by high-energy particles. It's close to particle physics, not to nucleus' physics - two very distinct activities regrettably grouped as nuclear physics. Be aware that there are very few employers in this activity.