November 24, 2024, 07:42:31 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Metal complexes colors in terms of their electronic configuration  (Read 2320 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline licamine

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
How can one explain the fact that [MnCl6]4- is colorless, whereas [MnCl4]2- is weakly colored and [FeCl4]2- is strongly colored using Crystal Field Theory? I know that Mn(II) has a d3 configuration and Fe(II) has a d4 configuration, and I can draw the diagrams of d orbitals in tetrahedral and octahedral fields, but I don't get how their specific configurations could explain the fact that there are more or less electronic transitions, thus explaining the different colors.

Thank you very much!

Offline mjc123

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2071
  • Mole Snacks: +302/-12
Re: Metal complexes colors in terms of their electronic configuration
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2017, 05:52:39 AM »
Well, for a start, Mn(II) is d5 and Fe(II) is d6. The 4s electrons ionise first.
What is special about the d5 configuration? How might this affect possible electronic transitions?
What is a fundamental difference between octahedral and tetrahedral symmetry? (Think of how we label the d orbitals.) How might this affect possible transitions?

Sponsored Links