November 25, 2024, 09:58:16 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Help in checking solutions of review questions  (Read 1475 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline schowder94

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Help in checking solutions of review questions
« on: August 29, 2021, 04:13:05 AM »
Hello everyone. This is my first time posting on this website. I am extremly terrible at organic chemistry. I have an exam coming up in a day and I need some help on completeing these last review questions before the exam. I am not sure about any of the products or if I am doing the problem correctly. I would like some help in checking if my solution is correct and perhaps helping me in finding the others if possible. The problems are:



Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2021, 09:23:58 AM »
Benzonitrile is just

N#Cc1ccccc1
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Meter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
  • Mole Snacks: +14/-5
  • Take what I say with a grain of salt
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2021, 11:11:37 AM »
Why not halogenation followed by NAS with cyanide?

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5706
  • Mole Snacks: +330/-24
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2021, 10:06:17 AM »
Regarding the hydration of an alkyne, you have conjured up an R group from somewhere, and it has confused the regiochemical issue.  I agree that tautomerization is part of the correct mechanism.

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5706
  • Mole Snacks: +330/-24
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2021, 11:11:24 AM »
I am also unsure why you chose diethyl phosphite in preference to a different phosphite.

Offline rolnor

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2299
  • Mole Snacks: +154/-10
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2021, 02:29:13 PM »
I am also unsure why you chose diethyl phosphite in preference to a different phosphite.

Before the Arbuzove reaction wich use triethylphosphite or similar, people use diethylphosphite and base as I recall. The Arbuzov is better I believe.
This is the other one:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michaelis%E2%80%93Becker_reaction

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5706
  • Mole Snacks: +330/-24
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2021, 04:36:12 PM »
I have done both Michaelis-Arbuzov and Michaelis-Becker reactions, and there are some advantages to the Michaelis-Becker way, in terms of side products.  However, one does need a very strong base.

Offline rolnor

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2299
  • Mole Snacks: +154/-10
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2021, 02:48:37 AM »
The by-product from Arbuzov is most often a gas at the reaction-temp. ?

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5706
  • Mole Snacks: +330/-24
Re: Help in checking solutions of review questions
« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2021, 08:18:31 AM »
Yes, the volatility works in one's favor, but I have seen small amounts of the impurity associated with alkylation of the by-product in the past.

Sponsored Links