November 27, 2024, 07:28:46 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!  (Read 22894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« on: November 18, 2006, 04:05:33 PM »
In a recent article by Carol Waseleski, in the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, she investigates the overabundance of exclamation marks, also known as exclamation points, by female bloggers. A typical reason given for all the exclamation marks is, females are more likely to become excitable and that the exclamation marks are "markers of excitability". But Waseleski argues that the exclamation marks are "markers of friendly interaction" and shove your gender-biases up your... At any rate, I decided to compare how many exclamation marks are seen on the front page of 3 female chem blogs that I visit frequently versus how many show up in 3 male chem blogs that I visit frequently. My data is shown below.

Female:
http://coronene.blogspot.com/   = 16
http://cultureofchemistry.blogspot.com/   = 12
http://propterdoc.blogspot.com/   = 17
Average = 15

Male:
http://www.thechemblog.com/   = 5
http://the-half-decent-pharmaceutical-chemistry-blog.chemblogs.org/   = 2
http://www.paulbracher.com/blog/   = 5
Average = 4

As can be clearly seen, female bloggers use exclamation marks more than males and thus are more friendly. I haven't included the following blogs, because it contradicts my hypothesis.

http://thedisgruntled.blogspot.com/   = 38
http://blog.chemicalforums.com/   = 29

Note1: Link to the article can be found here. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/waseleski.html
Note2: This was brought to my attention by http://improbable.com/2006/11/18/gals/

Mitch
« Last Edit: May 09, 2007, 12:31:53 AM by Mitch »
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline Albert

  • Lonely Wanderer
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1050
  • Mole Snacks: +112/-22
  • Gender: Male
  • Half Decent Pharmaceutical Chemist
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2006, 04:35:59 PM »

Offline terryed

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2006, 07:08:24 PM »
 :)  Mitch !!  I think your post is funny !, worth posting !, and well worth reading ! !.

  Thanks !,
   Ed of terryed

Offline Ψ×Ψ

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 263
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • ooh, shiny!
    • carbon-based curiosities
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2006, 09:21:30 PM »
Of course there are lots and lots of exclamation points in my blog!  I have to sound excitable because I don't always know what I'm talking about!  (Because I am an undergrad, NOT because I am a woman.)  Seriously, though, most other chemistry bloggers are grad students, postdocs, or working in industry...there probably isn't much that I know that they don't, or much that I could post that would seem remotely interesting if it weren't a little excitable.
Thank you for visiting frequently, though  :)

Offline ximik

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2006, 01:18:47 AM »
I thought that Kyle Finchsigmate was a girl... and Coronene was a boy!!!

You have to compare my blog(transitionstate) and Coronene's to prove or disprove that Coronene uses lots of exclamation points "because she is an undergrad, not NOT because she is a woman":-)

Offline FeLiXe

  • Theoretical Biochemist
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 462
  • Mole Snacks: +34/-7
  • Gender: Male
  • Excited?
    • Chemical Quantum Images
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2006, 12:08:12 PM »
to get a reproducible result you should divide the exclamation marks by the word count on the first page. and then you need a two sided t-test to prove your point ... then I'll believe you
Math and alcohol don't mix, so... please, don't drink and derive!

Offline Ψ×Ψ

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 263
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • ooh, shiny!
    • carbon-based curiosities
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2006, 04:40:50 PM »
to get a reproducible result you should divide the exclamation marks by the word count on the first page. and then you need a two sided t-test to prove your point ... then I'll believe you

wait, divide by word count or by sentence count?  Most people don't put exclamation points! in the middle! of sentences.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2006, 04:53:01 PM »
Most people don't put exclamation points! in the middle! of sentences.

You did. I wonder if it is because you are a female, or because you're an undergrad  :P

ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2006, 05:20:47 PM »
terryed: Glad you like it, check back frequently. ;)

?*?: No problem, :)

ximik: Kyle is male, although you'll have to verify that yourself.

FeLiXe: This was a preliminary study, a more thorough study can be done by others. :P

Borek: American undergrads won't understand European humour.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2006, 06:56:59 PM »
Borek: American undergrads won't understand European humour.

You should be glad my name ends with ek, not at  ;)

Is it too European once again?  :D
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #10 on: November 19, 2006, 08:14:00 PM »
Oh no, now I am going to picture Borek as Borat!
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Offline Ψ×Ψ

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 263
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-4
  • ooh, shiny!
    • carbon-based curiosities
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #11 on: November 19, 2006, 10:47:11 PM »
ximik: I'm really curious as to why you thought I was a man?  Most people don't make that mistake in person  ;D

borek: At my university! I was not required to take any English! classes, so my use of punctuation! may not be correct.

mitch: I'm still waiting for that e-mail at my university address...You can just facebook me if it's easier, but you have to find me first  ;)

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2006, 03:41:57 AM »
?*?, you're applying to Berkeley right?
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline Equi

  • chef de cuisine
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 151
  • Mole Snacks: +20/-11
  • Gender: Male
  • Und nach mir die Sintflut
    • miketionary
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2006, 06:37:07 AM »
Most people don't put exclamation points! in the middle! of sentences.

You did. I wonder if it is because you are a female, or because you're an undergrad  :P


This! is! ridiculous!!!!! :P

yeah, all come to Berkeley. Mitchy, you don't have any special contacts to the Mol Bio department? Go drink some coffee with the graduate admissions tutor ;)
I'm not suffering from a mental disease - I'm enjoying it.
miketionary

Offline ximik

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Investigations of "excitable" female bloggers!
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2006, 11:22:42 AM »
ximik: I'm really curious as to why you thought I was a man?  Most people don't make that mistake in person 

well, I don't know. The first time when I read your blog left such an impression. Maybe I am not an attentive reader :)

Sponsored Links