Quinine is one of the most important molecules in history (see the
C&EN feature as one of
The Top Pharmaceuticals That Changed The World. Nowadays the closest most of us come to this wonder-drug is the bitter taste in those fantastic gin & tonics at the local bar. Modern tonic water doesn’t contain enough quinine to be clinically effective, so it is only added for that great alkaloid taste.
Quinine was originally used by the Incas to treat malaria, and was later used throughout the world by conquerors from the Europe (a couple of other blogs have been discussing the merits of folk remedies versus pharma developed drugs:
@The Chem Blog,
@Chemical Musings). Anyway, this compound has saved countless lives, although now other remedies (e.g.,
chloroquine) have replaced quinine as a usual malaria treatment for cheapness and synthetic accessibility. Resistance to chloroquine may put quinine back into the spotlight, however.
Beyond its importance as a medicinal compound when isolated from natural sources (the bark of the
cinchona tree), this has been a fascinating molecule for synthetic chemistry. Most of the history of this story can be found in chapter 15 of
Classics in Total Synthesis II, possibly the best chapter in either of the
Classics books. I’ll summarize some of this history here.
Let’s begin with
Hofmann, who decided it might be possible to synthesize quinine from components of coal tar, and he talked his student,
Perkin, into trying this. The idea was to take two equivalents of
N-allyltoluidine (C
10H
13N) and three atoms of oxygen and, since you have the right number of all the atoms you would need for quinine (C
20H
24N
2O
2), they might spontaneously assemble and make the natural product (with water as a byproduct).
Those of us who are familiar with total synthesis will recognize that this is a low-yielding reaction. Perkin ended up with a bunch of tar. When cleaning his glassware with alcohol, he found that a purple compound was extracted from the tar, and this could effectively dye cloth a royal purple color. The dye,
mauveine (actually a mixture of two compounds), led to Perkin becoming a very rich man.
Around the same time,
Pasteur found that treating natural quinine with H
2SO
4 led to a different compound, now known as quinotoxine. In 1918,
Rabe reported the conversion of quinotoxine back into quinine. Then some 25 years later, the great
R. B. Woodward and his post-doc Doering synthesized quinotoxin, thereby completing a formal synthesis of quinine (details on the route
here).
Now it gets interesting. This synthesis was a landmark for Woodward, and would certainly ensure that he get a tenured faculty position at Harvard. However, there arose some questions about the validity of the formal synthesis, because the work of Rabe had not been repeated in Woodward’s lab. There is a fantastic review in
Angew. Chem. by Seeman which investigates this debate at length. I highly recommend reading this article. It’s 30 some pages, but worth every letter (
DOI link also featured in C&EN
here). Seeman ultimately concludes that Rabe did in fact convert quinotoxin to quinine in 1918, but these results may be difficult to reproduce since the experimental details are not very extensive.
This is a very interesting example of prominent figures questioning the validity of results reported in chemistry journals. This of course has been a hotbed of activity recently in light of Sames/Sezen-gate and hexacyclinol-gate. The difference is that now RBW is not around to explain his actions and decisions. Seeman did interview Doering (now an emeritus prof. at Harvard) and did get some insights. It is hard to say with certainty with a 60 year gap in the record.
We should all learn from this story. Chemistry is done by human beings, and that can be a good thing or a bad thing. Was Woodward knowingly skipping over steps he knew would be difficult to reproduce, if they were reproducible at all? Was this a situation where the most important factor was publishing in order to get tenure? We can’t know what was going through his head. Another point that Seeman makes, which is perhaps the most powerful in the whole debate, is that it is astonishing how quickly opinion turned against the Woodward report. As we get more and more skeptical of published results, we also run into the danger of becoming too quick to judge something false. The suggestion that results may be fabricated are certainly not a conviction, and the community must keep that in mind. Suspicious results are one thing,
proving them wrong is quite another.
Since the Woodward route was published, several others have appeared, notably one by
Stork, who was one of the principle figures in questioning the validity of the Woodward/Rabe route. Each of these syntheses is a great achievement. Over the years quinine has touched the fields of medicine, synthetic dyes, politics, and ethics. See, chemistry and history aren’t all that different after all!
By the way, the Stork paper has the greatest abstract of all time.
movies