December 22, 2024, 11:38:58 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Bio-Fuels  (Read 17745 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline billnotgatez

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4431
  • Mole Snacks: +224/-62
  • Gender: Male
Bio-Fuels
« on: March 18, 2008, 05:35:56 PM »
NPR had on the news that bio-fuels are still more expensive than regular, even with the price gouging going on by oil producers. They also talked about a study that showed the current method of bio-fuel production is not very green. I was such a fan of growing fuel and now I am disenchanted.


Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2008, 05:51:49 PM »
I know just who the ask ... no, not Al Gore ... all of your points were covered in a microcosm here: how green the procedure is, incidental production costs (cash and environmental), costs of infrastructure scale-up for a new technology: http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=21968.msg83936#msg83936
« Last Edit: March 18, 2008, 07:00:30 PM by Arkcon »
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline azmanam

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1416
  • Mole Snacks: +160/-24
  • Mediocrity is a handrail -Charles Louis d'Secondat
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2008, 06:49:28 PM »
Quote
even with the price gouging going on by oil producers.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23662031/
Knowing why you got a question wrong is better than knowing that you got a question right.

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2008, 07:39:50 PM »
The current method of production of biofuels is currently is not very green and produces fuel at a cost higher than gasoline.  However, technologies may improve such that biofuels may become more economically and environmentally friendly.

In the case of ethanol, ethanol is currently produced from corn.  Corn is a fairly energy intensive crop (for example, requiring much fertilizer to grow) causing problems both on the economic (high cost of raw material) and environmental (water pollution) sides of the problem.  Researchers, however, are investigating cellulosic ethanol technologies which will convert cellulose (either from agricultural waste or non-food crops) into ethanol.  Assuming researchers can develop a cost-effective means of converting cellulose into ethanol, this promises to be a more economically and environmentally friendly means of ethanol production.  These technologies, however, are at least 10 years away.

So, while ethanol (I haven't looked much into the other biofuels) currently is not a viable solution, the field still offers some promise.

Offline munchkiness

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2008, 08:49:42 PM »
Been looking around the web for articles relating to bio-fuels and stumbled across this:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080423115917.htm

As i'm not the greatest of chemists ( i suck at this subject actually )
I wondered what you lot make of it?

and on a totally different note:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvB3PiPBozU

I'm sure Mythbusters did a small scale test and found this technology failed, but as it's physics not sure how much of a reply i'll get.

Offline Gerard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-13
  • Gender: Male
  • "pressure makes diamond"
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2008, 02:29:27 PM »
there is still hope,one of the faculties in the philippines are trying to produce bio-fuel using yeast (S.cereversiae) and a lot more of these researcj is ongoing using different eco-friendly and economic wise methods...
cheers
-artificial student
"Charles! Charles! That's it Mr. Charles Darwin get out of this room, I told you once and I told you twice not to tease your fellow Mr. Arrhenius!"

Offline billnotgatez

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4431
  • Mole Snacks: +224/-62
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2008, 04:43:28 PM »
I happen to be a fan of bio-fuels but
There has been recent discussion that bio-mass to fuel production has increased the cost of food which is causing higher rates of starvation in the world.

Offline munchkiness

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2008, 10:11:05 PM »
I happen to be a fan of bio-fuels but
There has been recent discussion that bio-mass to fuel production has increased the cost of food which is causing higher rates of starvation in the world.


I have read that in the New Scientist Paper,

Hence why scientists are now looking into cyanobacterium as a future source of fuel, as described in the link in my above post.

Offline Gerard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-13
  • Gender: Male
  • "pressure makes diamond"
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2008, 12:13:52 PM »
I happen to be a fan of bio-fuels but
There has been recent discussion that bio-mass to fuel production has increased the cost of food which is causing higher rates of starvation in the world.


I have read that in the New Scientist Paper,

Hence why scientists are now looking into cyanobacterium as a future source of fuel, as described in the link in my above post.
yes,cyanobacterium and even clhorophyta algae are now undergoing in a research
"Charles! Charles! That's it Mr. Charles Darwin get out of this room, I told you once and I told you twice not to tease your fellow Mr. Arrhenius!"

Offline billnotgatez

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4431
  • Mole Snacks: +224/-62
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2008, 03:51:34 PM »
There is some indication that agriculture of the oceans is having a polluting effect as well as run off from land agriculture.


Offline Gerard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-13
  • Gender: Male
  • "pressure makes diamond"
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2008, 11:08:24 AM »
i help in the ulva research once they are considered as bio-indicators, meaning if the seawater is full of nitrogen and phosphorous they thrive very well so i dont think that farming them is necessary....
"Charles! Charles! That's it Mr. Charles Darwin get out of this room, I told you once and I told you twice not to tease your fellow Mr. Arrhenius!"

Offline HighTek

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2008, 10:14:21 PM »
What major does one declare if pursuing a career in Bio-fuels?

Organic Chemistry?
Biochemistry?
Envrionmental Chemistry?
Chemical & Petroleum Engineering?
I'm experiencing both Alzheimer's and Deja Vu right now, I think I forgot this before.

Offline Gerard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 196
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-13
  • Gender: Male
  • "pressure makes diamond"
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2008, 08:51:14 PM »
What major does one declare if pursuing a career in Bio-fuels?

Organic Chemistry?
Biochemistry?
Envrionmental Chemistry?
Chemical & Petroleum Engineering?
a combination of all,in fact my research head is a collaboration of the biochemical engineering dept.,environmental eng. dept. and the marine biology dept.
"Charles! Charles! That's it Mr. Charles Darwin get out of this room, I told you once and I told you twice not to tease your fellow Mr. Arrhenius!"

Offline tasmodevil44

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 79
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-11
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2008, 01:23:57 PM »
Overall,I think that ethanol from corn is a joke.It grows too slow and is not very efficient at photosynthesis.It's been basically a big scam and a fiasco.Same with soybeans.A few big swindlers will get rich off the government,taxpayers,and you and I...while driving up food prices and ruining the environment.

      If you really want to get serious(instead of ludicrous),industrial hemp and algae are the best ways to go about it.But the DEA(Drug Enforcement Administration)makes a big fuss about hemp and makes a mountain out of a molehill.Most of their arguements are silly and don't hold up to the real facts.There's simply not enough of the psychoactive THC ingredient in industrial hemp to get anybody high.I wonder if it's still because of big oil business politics controlling the government(so much for being brainwashed about how we still live in a democracy that is not run by a few wealthy elites).I for myself can't comprehend why oil companies would be against it.In fact,why can't they diversify their businesses into agriculture and grow hemp themselves?As time goes by,renewable hemp will be more economic and profitable to produce than non-renewable oil as they have to invest more money to extract the remaining difficult stuff from shale,tar sands,and etc.

      However,that is not to say that existing ethanol plants can't eventually evolve into something better as time goes by.For example,ethanol plants could eventually be modified for butanol,which in many respects is a better alcohol fuel.And instead of low productivity corn and sugar beets,why not cellulosic butanol from industrial hemp by somehow modifying existing ethanol plants?

      Hemp and also fast-growing algae shoud take far less landspace,harm the environment less,and not compete with food production to feed a hungry world population.I think this is the best route to eventually be taken for biofuels.

Offline foxdirect

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Bio-Fuels
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2008, 04:06:01 AM »
Biofuel is MUCH cheaper to make than regular petrol.  On the order of <$1/gallon!

NPR is plain wrong.  See http://www.BioFuelDebate.com for REAL facts from people that make biofuel / biodiesel.

-J
« Last Edit: June 17, 2008, 06:24:49 AM by Borek »

Sponsored Links