November 28, 2024, 09:54:55 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?  (Read 10754 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline MorganFreeman

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« on: June 26, 2008, 02:20:51 AM »
The death penalty is unconstitutional.

The act of killing somebody int the event to the death penalty evokes all of one's rights.

Yea or nay, and why?

Offline P

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 638
  • Mole Snacks: +64/-15
  • Gender: Male
  • I am what I am
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2008, 04:52:30 AM »
You ceased to have any rights when you decided to kill selfishly for your own personal gain in the first place.  You know the punishment - if you can't do the time then don't do the crime.

In Kent in the UK recently there was a murderer who has been released early from prison - for good behaviour whilst inside. He killed a young kid. This kids parents run the risk of bumping into their child's murderer in the high street every weekend when they go into town to go shopping.  Nowadays, in this country, you really can get away with murder!
Tonight I’m going to party like it’s on sale for $19.99!

- Apu Nahasapeemapetilon

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2008, 12:33:19 PM »
I don't see how the death penalty is unconstitutional. It just keeps the victims from having to do the dirty work themselves.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline MorganFreeman

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2008, 01:06:44 PM »
You ceased to have any rights when you decided to kill selfishly for your own personal gain in the first place.  You know the punishment - if you can't do the time then don't do the crime.

In Kent in the UK recently there was a murderer who has been released early from prison - for good behaviour whilst inside. He killed a young kid. This kids parents run the risk of bumping into their child's murderer in the high street every weekend when they go into town to go shopping.  Nowadays, in this country, you really can get away with murder!

The point is that it is unconstitutional in the USA, not the UK.

If you commit a crime you may be sent to jail, and some of your rights are removed (ex. the right to bear arms), but, when you are given the death penalty, no rights remain for you to excercise.

Remember the pledge of allegiance? The last line goes: "... indivisible, with LIBERTY and justice FOR ALL."


Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2008, 06:01:00 PM »
Thanks for making my point, Keyword justice. You would have a valid point if it had said equity.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline C6H8O7

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 38
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2008, 01:39:09 AM »
I am more prone to think in terms of human evolution more so than moral or personal benefit.


As a species its probably a good idea to evolve out the murderers now.Also rapists who forcefully demand sex especially considering how they are self-propagating  if the lady comes to child and abortion is outlawed.

Constitutional rights mean nothing anymore.I have had mine violated numerous times by representatives of them.

Offline MorganFreeman

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 24
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2008, 02:54:27 PM »
Thanks for making my point, Keyword justice. You would have a valid point if it had said equity.

While the death penalty is a form of justice, it denies the individual liberty and the pursuit of hapinness.

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Death Penalty Con Argument, Is this REASONABLE?
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2008, 03:23:16 PM »
Ummm.... They lost the right to be happy when they killed someone, I'm not sure where you're argument actually stands.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Sponsored Links