[Juan R.]

I am skeptic of the true existence of a TOE. However, since we are interested in the study of a part of spectra of scientific knowledge, I would ask if canonical science is an “TOE” for almost practical purposes.

After of so many delays -due to external impediments- I have already launched the canonical science project. The last impediment has been so stupid like follow. I ordered a website for the Center, payed the hosting with a check and mail service “lost” the check. Since there is an minimum 31 days interval previous to any reclamation. I was obliged to wait before reclaim my check. Once reclaimed it took another pair of weeks for waiting the official reply. Finally, I ordered the website in another place.

Canonical science is a new, very advanced, scientific theory that embraces physics, chemistry, biology, etc.

On www.canonical.chemicalforums.com you can now obtain the last hot news on canonical science and the Center. Since previous canonical science forum was forced to close, I have opened a blog where I will post the last advances in research and education and comments on each new article published in our new advanced journal Can. Sci. Rep.

I think that many chemists will be uninterested in parts of canonical science regarding quantum gravity, particle physics, string theory, cosmology, ecology, or nonlinear economy, between others. I believe that chemical community (I was a physical chemist but now I call myself canonical scientist) will be interested just in the chemical physics or physical chemistry branches of canonical science.

Some notes on this.

Physical chemistry is completely outdated. This is the reason that specialists on other similar disciplines (physicists, biophysicists, etc.) often reject chemical literature. There are two approaches to “chemical physics” questions: the approach by theoretical chemists, and the rest.

I am sorry to say this but the approach by chemists is frequently outdated (this was one of causes I did not continue on my physical chemistry dept. on University).

For instance, recently (2002) a group of physical chemists (from Australia) did a sound paper on thermodynamics. The content and basic ideas are compatible with standard chemical literature (e.g. Levine manual on physical chemistry) but completely wrong. Many comments by specialists (physicists and me) were published elsewhere and chemical community, unfortunately, ridiculed.

Some years ago, Nobel laureate for physics P.W. Anderson did a joke on highly respected journal Science. He said that if you asked to a chemist what is ammonia molecule he/she would say you the wrong answer. Then I was an undergraduate student and was furious with this public “vexation”. However, he was almost correct; even today I take a recent manual on inorganic chemistry and it still maintains that ammonia <b> is</b> a pyramidal molecule, which is not true. If ammonia were a pyramidal molecule always, then physicists newer would develop the ammonia maser. Ammonia is a pyramidal molecule, but also is a planar structure. Both structures coexist.

I read an advanced manual on density matrix theory and the author recommended, without rubber, that you would no use chemical literature on the topic (e.g. Pilar quantum chemistry manual) because was full of flaws, for instance completely incorrect definitions of density matrices for electronic structure.

The most advanced and exciting advanced in adsorption kinetics was done by... a group of physicists some years ago. Chemists like the old ART approach (that appears in basic courses of physical chemistry), which is based in traditional outdated ideas about chemical reactions, and rudely critiqued the new SRT. Almost all of criticism was shown to be incorrect and today, in specialized chemical journals like Langmuir, people begins, slowly, to recognize that SRT is the best approach to kinetics with the old ART like an “unconvincing” method (often the fit of experimental data introduces unphysical behaviors like negative activation energies, etc.).

Etc.


If you have any question regarding canonical chemistry view on physical chemistry topics, you can post it in this physical chemistry forum and I attempted to solve for you. Note that standard questions that can be solved from usual physical chemistry literature (e.g. what is the relationship between Cv and Cp for a nonideal gas) and/or from other members of this community would be not adequate. I think that all questions are interesting; simply I have no time due to my new responsibilities on the Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE), the canonical project and the blog, Canonical Science Reports, and my collaboration with electrochemist Shagaev on modification of the model of scientific publication.

Thanks

[Lola]

I'd like to present the discoveries of professor of physico-chemistry, Ph.D.Najip Valitov. He has absolutely brilliant scientific works on physico-chemistry. For instance, these two scientific monographs:

1.Vacuum Vibrations at Chemical Excitation of Atoms, Molecules and Chaoticity of Power Lines of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Field. - Published by GILEM publishing house, Ufa city, Russia. -100 pages. -schemes, equations.
2.Electromagnetic and gravitational Interactions of Virtual Dipoles, T-Invariance, Instantaneousness and Periodicity of the Equilibrium Processe, the Universal Character of isothermally and Thermally desorbed Particles. - Ufa city, Russia. - 309 pages, schemes, equations.

 Besides these two monographs professor valitov has published over 180 scientific articles in different magazines.
  He brought new theories of his own with more than 150 equations.
1.He discovered the endless speed/or instantaneous/, which is the next step or level after Einsten's theories.
2.He has his own theory of electricity, after Faradey, never published before.
3.He proved some of the assumptions of Newton, Maxwell, Einstein.
4.He finished the UNIFIED FIELD THEORY, that Einstein couldn't finish. He has SIX EQUATIONS OF HIS OWN OF THE UNIFIED FIELD OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVES.
5.He discovered THE REVERSE OSMOSIS.Before him the science knew only THE DIRECT OSMOSIS.
6.He discovered the laws of the movement of three types of the particles /elementary, atoms, molecules//The first type of movement is VIBRATING,, which is responsible for stable materials, that can be build out of these particles, and the means of transport, that can be built of them for safety.The safe, without side effects pharmacy can be produced with a help of VIBRATING PARTICLES.
  The other type of the particles - MOVING FORWARD, - is responsible for the TORNADOES, EARTHQUAKES, STORMS, TSUNAMI. By removing these particular particles it's possible to STOP natural disasters.
6.One os his side discoveries will allow to use the new method of diagnosis, which is very cheap and doesn't have any harmful side effects.
7.He discovered the REVERSE TIME, TIME ZERO, that can co-exist with a ordinary, direct time.
  Professor Valitov did about 10.000 experiments with the industrial catalysts and he applied about 18 process into indusrty.
   His web-site:
www.bashedu.ru/ValitovNKH.htm

  If you are interested in his works and discoveries, you can write me here, I'll answer you.If you need some materials, his works, descriptions, let me know and I'll send them to you.

[Juan R.]

I see you prefer use a nickname. Interesting!

I did not know Valitov theories. In fact, there is practically noting in usual literature, and this is an important point for me. Of course, there is still nothing "serious" about canonical science, but the theory is very young (I finished my studies on university recently) whereas Valitov is a older man.

My work has already achieved the solution to many unsolved questions by other methods and embraces from string theory to gravitation or cosmology. Still I do not use the term TOE because I think that it does not exist, but currently I can derived practically all of physical chemistry from one single equation (canonical one).

It appears that Valitov has absolutely brilliant scientific works on physico-chemistry, but they appears to be more specific methods than an unified theory. Of course, I am interested: all theories, methods, concepts, ideas, etc. are interesting for me!

Now i am working in field theory and now i am interested in this topic. I think that it will be interesting also for physical chemists. On gravitation, we could talk in another part.

What mean point 1?

What is the basis of 2?

I think that by UNIFIED FIELD THEORY you mean an unified description of electromagnetism and gravitation.

You said that he has SIX EQUATIONS OF HIS OWN OF THE UNIFIED FIELD OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVES. What is an electromagnetic field? what is the relationship with Maxwell fields?

[Lola]

The basis for ONE is the fact, that the highest possible speed was never considered as  the reciprocity /interaction/ between the objects.Valitov , I think, for the first time
considered this speed as such interaction. For instance, he gives an example:
we have a Sun and the Earth /or the Earth and the Moon/. There is certain interaction between them - gravitational and electromagnetic. The charge of the electromagnetic and gravitational waves from the Sun towards the Earth/or from the Earth towards the Moon/ has ONE number, let's just guess, for example, it's +9.
The same charge of the electromagnetic and gravitational waves from the Earth to Sun /or from the Moon towards the Earth/ have the number -9. Because of the opposite character of these two charges the total sum between them will be ZERO, which means THE ENDLESS OR INSTANTANEOUS SPEED , EXISTING BETWEEN THE PLANETS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM AND THE OTHER PLANETS OF THE UNIVERSE, BUT ALSO BETWEEN ALL THE PARTICLES IN GENERAL /MOLECULES, ATOMS, ELEMENTARY PARTICLES/.
  The probelm of this discovery is its  such unbelievable simplicity, that it makes it difficult to accept it right the way.
   Valitov told me , that nobody really paid attention to the RECIPROCITY/interaction/ between the planets, and particles, which is endless, when you add two opposite charges, acting in two opposite directions, this why, maybe, many great scientists missed this point.
  About Valitov's own theory of the electricity I can ask him more, because I often speak to him. Then I'll be happy to write you more on this site. I only know, that the concept of electricity comes from his concept of  the discovery number one, which is new after Einstein and of course, his new understanding of the UNIFIED FIELD THEORY helped him to create such theory of the electricity.
   About the UNIFIED FIELD THEORY I can answer you in few days, because I want to speak to professor Valitov himself, so I'll have his answer for you.
   I am one of the biggest friends and admirers of professor Valitov, and  I hope, that my explainations will help you to understand part of his discoveries. I'd be very happy to answer all your questions.
 

[Juan R.]

Thanks by your reply.

I am sorry to say this but your explaining is very ambigous and it is very difficult for me to follow the thecnical details of your reasoning.

For example your "the highest possible speed was never considered as  the reciprocity /interaction/ between the objects." is like if I say that "the epsilon of the structure of the vortice indicates the polarization of the cricksom". I don't understand you and you don't understand to me.

Write simply the interaction bewteen two electrons (I prefer because it is of direct interest for physical chemists) or between the Sun and Earth.

According to Coulomb:

V = ee/R

in units of 4 pi epsilon₀ = 1

Acording to Valitov?

[Lola]

I spoke today with professor Valitov, and he tells me his own explaination.
He explains, that he took the time or the movement of the electromagnetic and gravitational waves from Earth towards Sun, for instance, is +9 /this number is just an example, the exact numbers are in his book/. The time of the movement of the electromagnetic and gravitational waves from Sun towards Earth could be -9.
   He has a simple equation for this :
       s
V =  _
       T /this is a Greek letter Tau, I don't have it now/

   So, the speed is   V, the distance between Earth and Sun is   s, and the T /tau/ is time.
   
   Because the time , when you add +9 and -9 as two opposite directions of the movement, becomces ZERO, when you add these two numbers. So, the TIME IS ZERO in this case.
 If you have zero time between two planets like earth and sun, or between two electrons, you'll have ZERO SPEED .
   So, in this equation, if you have ZERO T /tau/, then you'll have ZERO V.  
So, it comes, that V  IS ZERO OR INSTANTANEOUS.
   This theory also explains the QUANTUM TELEPORTATION as instantaneous reciprocity between earth and sun or between two electrons.
   For this Valitov has a special paragraph in his second monograph I listed before.

   I can ask for you any questions, while I speak to professor, and then bring the answer to you.

   

[Juan R.]

I spoke today with professor Valitov, and he tells me his own explaination.
He explains, that he took the time or the movement of the electromagnetic and gravitational waves from Earth towards Sun, for instance, is +9 /this number is just an example, the exact numbers are in his book/. The time of the movement of the electromagnetic and gravitational waves from Sun towards Earth could be -9.
   He has a simple equation for this :
       s
V =  _
       T /this is a Greek letter Tau, I don't have it now/

   So, the speed is   V, the distance between Earth and Sun is   s, and the T /tau/ is time.
   
   Because the time , when you add +9 and -9 as two opposite directions of the movement, becomces ZERO, when you add these two numbers. So, the TIME IS ZERO in this case.
 If you have zero time between two planets like earth and sun, or between two electrons, you'll have ZERO SPEED .
   So, in this equation, if you have ZERO T /tau/, then you'll have ZERO V.  
So, it comes, that V  IS ZERO OR INSTANTANEOUS.
   This theory also explains the QUANTUM TELEPORTATION as instantaneous reciprocity between earth and sun or between two electrons.
   For this Valitov has a special paragraph in his second monograph I listed before.

   I can ask for you any questions, while I speak to professor, and then bring the answer to you.

I have not more questions for you.

Your joke has been interesting.

I suspected it when i see your "afilliation" and nickname.

Thanks. I am not now in the staff by schedule motives, but according to forums rules I would solicit to you the posting of relevant comments to physical chemistry or answers to questions by other members

[NotAChemistYet]

      s
V =  _
       T /this is a Greek letter Tau, I don't have it now/

 
 If you have zero time between two planets like earth and sun, or between two electrons, you'll have ZERO SPEED .
   So, in this equation, if you have ZERO T /tau/, then you'll have ZERO V.  
So, it comes, that V  IS ZERO OR INSTANTANEOUS.

It is wrong. If the T is zero V is infinity.

[Lola]

At least there is an interest in Valitov's theories here.

[Lola]

Valitov used the famous Brownian movement equation of Einstein to describe the movement of the planets of Solar System and he used the equation of the third law of Kepler for the description of the movement of the electrons around the nucleus.
   He made all possible calculations between the planets of Solar System.
   His theory of the unified field has his original four equations, which also include the description of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields.

[Juan R.]

Lola,

I don't know how say this for you, but i think (of course only administrators can say the last word) that your posts here are not very acceptable.

I think that you are not being very honest with us. Your reply to Coulomb question say much from you, even ignoring your mathematical errors.

I sincerely think that this forum is not the best site for that kind of posting that you want. Of course, i am not very adequate for say this (and i am only a member of this community), by it is my sincere opinion.

Please be free for posting comments on physical chemistry question, mainly of educative value.

Thanks.

[Lola]

I am absolutely honest person. This forum is for everyone and it doesn't have any special privileges for ones over the others.
   Yes, I made a mistake, telling, that the speed V becomes zero. It is not zero, it's
endless speed. But this is exactly what Valitov proved in his theory - the endless speed.

[Juan R.]

Of course, this forum is open to everyone, but i think that i said still may be correct.

I think that you are not being very honest with us. Your reply to Coulomb question say much from you, even ignoring your mathematical errors.

I sincerely think that this forum is not the best site for that kind of posting that you want. Of course, i am not very adequate for say this (and i am only a member of this community), by it is my sincere opinion.

Please be free for posting comments on physical chemistry question, mainly of educative value.

Thanks.

Any Spanish 16-year old student learns a lot of stuff from your reply of "speed" to the above "Coulomb" query.