0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
(2S)-4-(N,N-dimethylamino)-3-methyl-1,2-diphenylbutan-2-olI guess you would not need to add "N,N" but I put it just in case. Did you notice that there's one asymmetric carbon atom more in the structure?
Quote from: StarvinMarvin on May 03, 2009, 04:10:57 PM(2S)-4-(N,N-dimethylamino)-3-methyl-1,2-diphenylbutan-2-olI guess you would not need to add "N,N" but I put it just in case. Did you notice that there's one asymmetric carbon atom more in the structure?
so why didn't you state the second chiral carbon in your naming?
Quote from: anilin on May 04, 2009, 04:01:35 PMQuote from: StarvinMarvin on May 03, 2009, 04:10:57 PM(2S)-4-(N,N-dimethylamino)-3-methyl-1,2-diphenylbutan-2-olI guess you would not need to add "N,N" but I put it just in case. Did you notice that there's one asymmetric carbon atom more in the structure?I'd think you only would be forced to use the N,N convention if there were a second amine or similar in the molecule, but it doesn't harm things.Quote from: anilin on May 04, 2009, 04:01:35 PMso why didn't you state the second chiral carbon in your naming?Probably because you haven't unambiguously shown the stereochemistry at that second carbon? What is the configuration at C3?
Quote from: sjb on May 04, 2009, 04:30:52 PMQuote from: anilin on May 04, 2009, 04:01:35 PMso why didn't you state the second chiral carbon in your naming?Probably because you haven't unambiguously shown the stereochemistry at that second carbon? What is the configuration at C3?thanks, I don’t think my drawing is ambiguous for the purpose of determining stereochemistry at C3. I think it is S.
Quote from: anilin on May 04, 2009, 04:01:35 PMso why didn't you state the second chiral carbon in your naming?Probably because you haven't unambiguously shown the stereochemistry at that second carbon? What is the configuration at C3?