Orgopete, I should have just looked this link up for the OP right away. It describes reduction of an amide to an amine by LAH.
http://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/courses/351/Carey5th/Ch22/ch22-2-2-4.html
The main point I missed is aluminum complexing with the deprotonated alcohol, allowing oxygen to be expelled as part of a leaving group. Clearly any alcohol created will be deprotonated first by LAH but I glossed over that part. I assume this is how carboxylic acid reduction works as well, although in that case I know often people people make an ester first to avoid mixing acid and LAH.
I don't mean to break the thread on this topic, but I had just answered
another post on how organic chemistry "ought" to be taught. In that post, I argued, "… that if students learn the reaction mechanisms (the logical steps showing how the products form), they can solve any problem with that same mechanism."
I had disagreed originally as the proposed mechanisms were not making chemical sense. (I concede to selling a reaction mechanism book in which one of my main objectives was to make
every step logically complete.) My rational for doing so is to encourage students to think mechanistically. By that, I mean that every step must make logical chemical sense.
The problem that I have with this solution or link, is that it fails on those grounds. It does not make logical chemical sense. The distinction is that if only partial steps are required and we are allowed to guess at any missing steps, logical or not, then we are encouraging students to skip writing a reaction mechanism. I argue that doing so begs the issue in this case as it is the absence of a reaction mechanism that initiated this question.
While I am not answering the OP's question in this reply (I am breaking the thread), I am offering up a mechanism for amide reduction from
A Handbook of Organic Chemistry Mechanisms. I cannot guarantee the accuracy of this mechanism, however I believe they meet the concept of writing complete logical chemical steps (and improve learning). If one reviews the prior posts, I think they extended this discussion for precisely this reason (for example, no
-OH or ROH groups are present during the reduction). Had all posters written a
complete mechanism as I have done, they may not have offered some of the suggestions.
Disclaimer, it is difficult to refrain from being a self serving advertisement for my books. However, my books are simply an extension of my organic chemistry courses of the 1960s. I knew my professors wrote the reaction mechanisms that were to be repeated on a new problem on an exam. If I wished to write the mechanism for the exam problem, I had to be able to write at least one example. In learning and writing the mechanisms, each step had to pass the test of chemical logic.