April 01, 2025, 08:29:54 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Electron configuration 3p 4s 3d  (Read 4684 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline huskywolf

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 126
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-8
  • Gender: Male
Electron configuration 3p 4s 3d
« on: December 06, 2009, 04:52:44 PM »
Hello
Can someone explain clearly why 4s comes infront of 3d in electron config
I know its got to do with energy levels but how do I calculate this
and why in Cu does 4s come after 3d?

Offline Fridushka

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 120
  • Mole Snacks: +17/-9
  • Gender: Female
Re: Electron configuration 3p 4s 3d
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2009, 05:05:15 PM »
Well write down the electronic configuration..most probably there will be something related with stability..

Offline huskywolf

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 126
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-8
  • Gender: Male
Re: Electron configuration 3p 4s 3d
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2009, 05:18:19 PM »
the little electrons like to fill the empty subshells on their own?
like people like to take an empty bus seat..instead of sitting beside another person(unless its a good looking girl)

Offline Ranadeep

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • I Love Chemistry : )
Re: Electron configuration 3p 4s 3d
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2009, 04:05:11 AM »
Refer to Aufbau Principle in some standard text book :) ..
I am 15 from India and i like doing chemistry

Offline stewie griffin

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 384
  • Mole Snacks: +61/-7
Re: Electron configuration 3p 4s 3d
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2009, 08:20:05 AM »
I agree with sitting next to cute girls on the bus. Always chose the seat next to the cute girl  ;)
Anyway, I'd just like to add a bit to the help that others have already provided. 
When we have the free atoms in the gas state, data indicates that the 4s is indeed lower than the 3d. Ok fine. But in solution and when complexed with ligands, the 3d orbitals are actually lower in energy than the 4s. So even though we write the configuration of iron (Fe) as 4s23d6, really when we do actual chemistry with iron we consider the iron to be 3d8. This is just FYI in case it bothers you for some reason to think that the 4s has to be below the 3d. It doesn't. However, for a gen chem exam, stick with the model of having the 4s orbitals lower in energy as that's what is taught in gen chem (and you don't want to lose those simple points  ;))

Sponsored Links