January 15, 2025, 04:42:16 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Proposing reagents for a product!??  (Read 12115 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline obliv

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Proposing reagents for a product!??
« on: March 02, 2010, 12:40:54 AM »
Hello all!

This will be formed starting from benzene.

I am trying to figure out the reagents needed to get to this product, I was thinking of using friedel crafts but it does not seem to work, I know before the last reagent I will need to use PCC but then after that I do not know what to use to get rid of the OH to make it an aldehyde. Any help would be appreciated! thanks.

Offline nj_bartel

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Mole Snacks: +76/-42
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2010, 01:02:12 AM »
Theoretical or real synthesis?

Offline obliv

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2010, 01:08:44 AM »
In this case theoretical.

Offline orgopete

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2636
  • Mole Snacks: +213/-71
    • Curved Arrow Press
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2010, 09:18:31 AM »
Well, if you are going to use PCC as the last reagent to your final product, what is the intermediate you need to make?
Author of a multi-tiered example based workbook for learning organic chemistry mechanisms.

Offline Schrödinger

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1162
  • Mole Snacks: +138/-98
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2010, 04:31:59 AM »
I was thinking of a method, but I thought I'd get certain things clarified first.
When you use the Grignard reagent RMgX, is it okay to have other functional groups in the hydrocarbon part 'R'? Is there any problem associated with this?
"Destiny is not a matter of chance; but a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved."
- William Jennings Bryan

Offline srihari

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2010, 08:02:33 AM »
@ schrodinger , what exactly do you want ?
I think it generally doesn't matter as long as you are thinking of attacking a
electrophilic carbon .
It matters if there are two sites of attack and you want one selectively
For ex : steric stuff may come into picture.

Is this what you were talking of??
life's game -play it

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2010, 10:05:18 AM »
I was thinking of a method, but I thought I'd get certain things clarified first.
When you use the Grignard reagent RMgX, is it okay to have other functional groups in the hydrocarbon part 'R'? Is there any problem associated with this?

If the R group contains a relatively acidic group it will tautomerise.

I like the organometallic strategy. I'd lithiate/metalate benzene and quench it with oxirane.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Schrödinger

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1162
  • Mole Snacks: +138/-98
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2010, 11:56:29 AM »
I am extremely sorry. I was thinking of something completely different. However, thanks for the explanation Dan.

Here's my approach :
1. Benzene to Halobenzene
2. Halobenzene to Phenyl Magnesium halide
3. Addition of glyoxal
4. Selective reduction of alcohol
"Destiny is not a matter of chance; but a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved."
- William Jennings Bryan

Offline srihari

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2010, 12:01:40 PM »
@ dan conjugation is also necessary na ?
without that I don't think it'll work

life's game -play it

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2010, 12:25:25 PM »
@ dan conjugation is also necessary na ?
without that I don't think it'll work

I don't understand your post, conjugation is necessary for what?

You should be able to deprotonate benzene (pKa 43) with MeLi (pKa of methane ~60), or even tBuLi, to give PhLi - quenching this organometallic with oxirane should give phenethyl alcohol.

You could also make the organometallic via a halobenzene (Schrödinger's post) by treatment with with the appropriate metal, or by metal-halogen exchange with something like BuLi.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Schrödinger

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1162
  • Mole Snacks: +138/-98
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2010, 12:31:01 PM »
If the R group contains a relatively acidic group it will tautomerise.
Dan, can you please explain this part again? I don't think I understood 'relativley acidic group' and its 'tautomerization'. Can you please give an example so that I'd be able to understand better?
"Destiny is not a matter of chance; but a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved."
- William Jennings Bryan

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2010, 02:02:53 PM »
I don't think I understood 'relativley acidic group' and its 'tautomerization'. Can you please give an example so that I'd be able to understand better?

Sure, the point is that carbanions are very strong bases. Say for example you have BrCH2CH2CO2tBu.

And you want to treat it with Mg to make a Grignard. The proton alpha to the carbonyl is much more acidic than a proton beta to the carbonyl, so the problem is:
-CH2CH2CO2tBu --tautomerisation--> CH3CH-CO2tBu <-> CH3CH=C(O-)OtBu

Perhaps this is more obvious with alcohols, taking BrCH2CH2CH2OH with Mg

-CH2CH2CH2OH ----> CH3CH2CH2O-

Does that clarify the point?
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Violet

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2010, 02:11:39 PM »
I am extremely sorry. I was thinking of something completely different. However, thanks for the explanation Dan.

Here's my approach :
1. Benzene to Halobenzene
2. Halobenzene to Phenyl Magnesium halide
3. Addition of glyoxal
4. Selective reduction of alcohol

If it's theoretical, why not just use epoxide in your step 3, and oxidize the OH in your stpe 4?

Offline srihari

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 47
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2010, 08:51:53 PM »
@ dan ,

I was thinking about the conjugation required to
have tautomeriztion in big molecules . Going from one
end to another , forgot the simple case :P
sorry and thanks for the example :)
my mistake
regards
Srihari
life's game -play it

Offline Schrödinger

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1162
  • Mole Snacks: +138/-98
  • Gender: Male
Re: Proposing reagents for a product!??
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2010, 11:24:07 PM »
I don't think I understood 'relativley acidic group' and its 'tautomerization'. Can you please give an example so that I'd be able to understand better?

Sure, the point is that carbanions are very strong bases. Say for example you have BrCH2CH2CO2tBu.

And you want to treat it with Mg to make a Grignard. The proton alpha to the carbonyl is much more acidic than a proton beta to the carbonyl, so the problem is:
-CH2CH2CO2tBu --tautomerisation--> CH3CH-CO2tBu <-> CH3CH=C(O-)OtBu

Perhaps this is more obvious with alcohols, taking BrCH2CH2CH2OH with Mg

-CH2CH2CH2OH ----> CH3CH2CH2O-

Does that clarify the point?
Thanks for the explanation Dan.
Just to be sure that I have understood completely :
Suppose I react BrCH2CHO with Mg, H2C=CHOMgBr (the enolate form) will be formed predominantly. Am I right?
"Destiny is not a matter of chance; but a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved."
- William Jennings Bryan

Sponsored Links