January 11, 2025, 03:00:33 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Why is borneol not usually known as its IUPAC name?  (Read 3468 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline bamster

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-11
Why is borneol not usually known as its IUPAC name?
« on: October 06, 2010, 01:44:07 PM »
???

Offline ooosh

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 85
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-3
Re: Why is borneol not usually known as its IUPAC name?
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2010, 09:25:07 PM »
Simpler than its IUPAC name.

Offline orgopete

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2636
  • Mole Snacks: +213/-71
    • Curved Arrow Press
Re: Why is borneol not usually known as its IUPAC name?
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2010, 06:48:17 AM »
Simpler than its IUPAC name.

Agreed!

Example 1
Borneol vs 1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol

Example 2
Cholesterol vs (8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-10,13-dimethyl-17-((R)-6-methylheptan-2-yl)-2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17-tetradecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-ol
(No, I didn't figure out the IUPAC name, I used ChemBioDraw to do it. However, this does illustrate why a common name might be preferred instead of an IUPAC name.)
Author of a multi-tiered example based workbook for learning organic chemistry mechanisms.

Sponsored Links