Re: trustworthy
Finding Truth
"Peer review is like a filter that removes fact from fiction However, peer review does not increase Truth. Repetition and agreement by experts will not increase Truth. If something is written in a textbook, it will not make it more true. Truth will only be as valid as the original proof (or proofs)." - PW (future publication).
I just wanted to put that out there. That really wasn't the actual question being asked (whether ARKIVOC can be used as a peer review reference), but an internet blog, the New York Times, JACS, or the National Enquirer can be true (but not in that order). For validity of references, ask your instructor. Chemistry is easier to find recognized peer reviewed journals, but physics seems loaded with quack "peer reviewed" journals.
Chemistry Facts or Fictions
“When an old and distinguished person speaks to you, listen to him carefully and with respect -- but do not believe him. Never put your trust into anything but your own intellect. Your elder, no matter whether he has gray hair or has lost his hair, no matter whether he is a Nobel laureate -- may be wrong. The world progresses, year by year, century by century, as the members of the younger generation find out what was wrong among the things that their elders said. So you must always be skeptical -- always think for yourself.” - Linus Pauling