November 16, 2024, 01:24:23 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination  (Read 5873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jake.n

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-1
Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« on: November 15, 2010, 05:29:31 PM »
I'm writing a research proposal for my advanced organic class and I need to find an appropriate protecting group for my hydroxy group.  I am faimilar with some protecting groups (eg. silyl ethers, trityl, benzoyl) but what makes one group better than another?  If you could point me towards some references it would be appreciated.  All I can find using Scifinder is alcohol oxidation-tandem olefinations, which I do not want.

Offline MissPhosgene

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 364
  • Mole Snacks: +23/-5
  • Gender: Female
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2010, 08:34:06 PM »
The answer kind of depends on what n can be. So, what is the range or number for n?
Stereograms of the 32 crystallographic point groups: little bike wheels of cold, hard, pure rationality.

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2010, 08:55:09 PM »
The choice of protection really depends on what you want to do later in the synthesis.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2010, 04:00:50 AM »
If all your halide for Wittig is is the bromo-alcohol as drawn, why not just add another equivalent of base when you form the ylid, then perhaps look at protection after attachment, if it's still needed?

Offline jake.n

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-1
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2010, 08:52:02 AM »
n will be in the 2-4 range.  If I can do the olefination without protecting the alcohol that would be great, too.  I just want to prevent further oxidation.

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2010, 11:02:52 AM »
n will be in the 2-4 range.  If I can do the olefination without protecting the alcohol that would be great, too.  I just want to prevent further oxidation.

Oxidation???
Just use 2 or more equivalents of base
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline MissPhosgene

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 364
  • Mole Snacks: +23/-5
  • Gender: Female
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2010, 11:04:38 AM »
Instead of oxidation, I would be worried about the reactant snapping shut with certain values of n.
Stereograms of the 32 crystallographic point groups: little bike wheels of cold, hard, pure rationality.

Offline jake.n

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 53
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-1
Re: Protecting Groups for Alcohols - Wittig Olefination
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2010, 12:58:09 PM »
I guess oxidation was not the correct wordage.  I was worried about my alkane snapping shut, as some of you mentioned.

Edit:  I found a couple of references to cite for the two eq. base method.  Thanks for the help
« Last Edit: November 16, 2010, 01:59:44 PM by jake.n »

Sponsored Links