December 23, 2024, 06:02:43 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: A helium nucleus has two protons and two neutrons.How many electrons would it ta  (Read 26305 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bjc51192

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Ok I already have the answer, but I dont understand why the answer is 7000.

Helium has a mass of about 4.00 and the mass of an electron is 0.0055(amu) How in the world did they come up with 7000?

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Ok I already have the answer, but I dont understand why the answer is 7000.

Helium has a mass of about 4.00 and the mass of an electron is 0.0055(amu) How in the world did they come up with 7000?

If I have a football that weighs 400g, and marbles that weigh 4g, how many marbles do I need to weigh the same as the football?

Offline Bjc51192

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Ok I already have the answer, but I dont understand why the answer is 7000.

Helium has a mass of about 4.00 and the mass of an electron is 0.0055(amu) How in the world did they come up with 7000?

If I have a football that weighs 400g, and marbles that weigh 4g, how many marbles do I need to weigh the same as the football?

100? but I dont understand what I did was multiply 4.00 (0.0055) and divide that answer by 1 and got 0.22. Is their a certain step that I am missing?

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
So for my example you did the sum 400 ÷ 4, but for yours, did you not do 4 ÷ 0.0055 ?

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27887
  • Mole Snacks: +1815/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
what I did was multiply 4.00 (0.0055)

You are multiplying what by what in hope of getting what?

Are you sure it is 0.0055? Doesn't look to me like it will give 7000, unless my calculator is failing me.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Bjc51192

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
No. im just going by what my book said the mass of an electron was. I looked it up it said is 0.00055, but that doesnt seem to give the right answer

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27887
  • Mole Snacks: +1815/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
0.0055 and 0.00055 are two different numbers.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Bjc51192

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Reguardless I cant get the answer.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27887
  • Mole Snacks: +1815/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
I asked you a question, two posts ago.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline Bjc51192

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 63
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Since the mass of an electron is about 1/1837th the mass of a proton, then it will take many, many electrons to equal the *mass* of the helium nucleus. Since the mass of of the helium nucleus is approx. 4.00 amu, then ...

4 amu x 1837 electrons /1 amu = 7348 electrons

You would need about 7350 electrons to equal the mass of a helium nucleus.


This is how to get the answer I just dont understand why the mass of an electron is 1/1837th the mass of a proton when in my book it says. and its 7000 because Its rounded to 1 sig fig

Offline rabolisk

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 494
  • Mole Snacks: +45/-25
What does your book say that a mass of an electron is? If you go by 0.00055 amu, then 0.00055 / 1 = 1/1819, which is close to 1/1837.

If you're asking why an electron weighs that much less than a proton, the best answer is that it just is.

Sponsored Links