According to my reference it wasnt necessary to push the reaction foreward by using mol sieves or any other drying agent and good yields was reported without.
Is this reported for exactly the same substrate - or at least a similarly hindered ketone?
A drying agent can't hurt, and it sounds like the imine is not forming under the conditions you're using, or it is very hydrolytically unstable. Maybe Dean-Stark it. It would be worth identifying the two products from the cyanoborohydride reaction - is one of them 4-cyclohexyl-1-phenylbutan-2-ol? This would point to an unfavourable ketone <> ketimine equilibrium. You may have to be quite aggressive.
It's worth trying propylamine, H
2, Pd/C. You can often do this at atmospheric pressure with a balloon of H
2, though it may be slow.
Another way around that I would consider if this imine is not behaving is as follows. It's longer but probably more reliable:
1. NaBH
4 (to give 4-cyclohexyl-1-phenylbutan-2-ol)
2. Tf
2O, MsCl, or TsCl (that would be my order of preference for sulfonylation)
3. NaN
3 (to give 2-azido-4-cyclohexyl-1-phenylbutane)
4. Propionaldehyde (1 eq), H
2, Pd/C(one pot)
It's not as long as it looks - chromatography is unlikely to be required until the end of the sequence. Steps 1,2,3 should be very clean and just require washing away the salts, and I reckon step 4 will give the target secondary amine quite cleanly because the bulk of it will probably heavily disfavour overalkylation.