I've stumbled over the very text telling why dicyclobutyl is easy to produce. In:
Novel Metathesis Chemistry, edited by Y. Imamoglu, L. Bencze
page 336 and around (excerpts on Google Books).
Metathesis of easily obtained methylenecyclobutane (optionally with dimethylenecyclobutane), followed by hydrogenation, give dicyclobutyl (and tricyclobutyl), as sketched here. The desirable mix of both is supposedly even easier to get. Heavier compounds don't hurt in small amount and are easily separated.
Caution: the performance table in the book isn't credible. Maybe their "kerosene" reference is very bad, but dicyclobutyl gains only 4s over the usual RG-1, and the spiro compounds are denser and more efficient than the cyclobutyls. Biased comparison.
For safety (and density), tricyclobutyl is better, or at least a mix. Then, I prefer a 2+2 photocycloaddition of vinylcyclobutane as on August 08, 2015 if it works. If correct, the data for linear tricyclobutyl is already very pleasant: bp+190°C, mp-47°C, 890kg/m3, just half a second behind dicyclobutyl.