November 24, 2024, 06:11:54 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Measurement uncertainty and calibration curves  (Read 3849 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Henderson-Hasselbalch

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Measurement uncertainty and calibration curves
« on: August 14, 2011, 09:09:00 AM »
Hi,
For my environmental chemistry paper I needed to prepare a calibration curve for an experiment. I plotted the absorbances in EXCEL, obtained the slope and the slope's error. Does the error of the slope encompass the uncertainty associated with the dilutions of the stock solution to make the calibration standards (from micropipettes, volumetric flasks, etc.)?

Offline voidSetup

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 112
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: Measurement uncertainty and calibration curves
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2011, 09:58:51 PM »
I think so, it's a different kind if uncertainty from a distribution of measurements vs an uncertainty associated with an instrument or tool.

Offline Stepan

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 358
  • Mole Snacks: +39/-4
  • Gender: Male
  • Air Chemistry Man
    • Supplier of air sampling equipment and services
Re: Measurement uncertainty and calibration curves
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2011, 08:36:47 PM »
How you build your standards and plotted the calibration line or curve this is up to you. Uncertainty is measured as standard deviation of matrix spikes prepared from independent stock and measured 7-10 times at different loads: at the detection limit, at the middle of you range and near the upper edge of the range.

Properly calibrated pipettes add only 0.5-1% of uncertainty into overall error. 

Sponsored Links