being in the lab all of the time is a bit tedious and it's not something I want to do as my career.
I do not want to become a prof or work in a lab doing experiments when i enter the real world and get a job.
I mentioned money being one of my strong motivations, which he said I could achieve with a PhD as well.
There's three reasons why you should no do a PhD. I can't believe that you are even considering it if you have no interest in academia and find it tedious. Too many people just fall into a PhD in their MSc project lab because, in the short term, it's the easiest thing to do. Unfortunately, many of these people have a bad time in research because they are disinterested and unmotivated, leading to low creativity in problem solving and little desire to learn and develop. Don't be one of those people, it's a waste of time.
If money is one of your strong motivations, forget a PhD. You should not do a PhD if the main reason you do it is to increase your future salary. It is arguably harder to get a job if you have a PhD, and I think if you spend those years climbing the salary scale within a company instead, you will probably end up as well off.
Does anyone know of any people that have taken alternative routes after a degree in chemistry? I would really be interested in hearing them because right now I am just trying to consider all my options.
Yes, I started a PhD, but of my 4 classmates from undergrad: One went into the pharmaceutical industry, but the other 3 went into accountancy and consultancy. I don't really know how it works, because it has never interested me at all, but as I understand it these big consultancy etc. companies run graduate recruitment programs which are basically intensive training courses, and if you pass all the exams they give you a job.
I know a guy who went into scientific patents as well.
It's really been bothering me especially with my supervisor pushing the PhD program onto me on a constant basis.
You need to be careful, while I do not intend to directly accuse your boss here, consider the possibility that this is selfish advice. If I was a supervisor, I would be keen to retain masters students who I know are competent from first hand experience.
From what you've said, my honest opinion is that you should not do a PhD. I don't think you'll enjoy it, and I don't think it will aid career progression in any direction other than chemistry (and mainly academic chemistry), which sounds like an area you want to get out of.
There is no age limit for a PhD, you could always do it in a few years if you know you want to do it after trying something else.