December 27, 2024, 04:52:06 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: IR signature of isopentyl acetate  (Read 10353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-1
  • I'm a mole!
IR signature of isopentyl acetate
« on: December 04, 2005, 02:28:06 PM »
Could someone direct me to a website with the IR signature of Isopentyl Acetate.  I conducted an experiment used IR for Identification and would like to have something to compare to.

Thanks.

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re:IR signature of isopentyl acetate
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2005, 05:07:56 PM »
http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ has some good reference spectra, though I prefer looking in resources like the Aldritch Library of FTIR Spectra (which should be available at a university chemistry library).

Offline nate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-1
  • I'm a mole!
Re:IR signature of isopentyl acetate
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2005, 05:13:17 PM »
Thanks.  Here is another question for you.  I am to report my findings in "journal style format", i.e short and concise.  When reporting data from the IR spectra, do you report the freq. of each peak or just the ones inidicative of the structure you are testing?

Thanks.

Offline Yggdrasil

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3215
  • Mole Snacks: +485/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Physical Biochemist
Re:IR signature of isopentyl acetate
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2005, 05:15:45 PM »
You should probably report all significant peaks, even if they don't correspond correctly to your molecule.  This will help you and others reading you paper an idea of what kind of contaminants are present in your sample.

Offline nate

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-1
  • I'm a mole!
Re:IR signature of isopentyl acetate
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2005, 05:57:25 PM »
Okay, thanks.

Sponsored Links