Thanks for the response, Arkcon!
What I'm asking here is whether or not there is a reason why a hydrogen bond could not be formed within a dipeptide, given that the there are polar groups present which would form a hydrogen bond in a helical polypeptide.
My point of view is that if there are polar groups in neighboring amino acids in a dipeptide, there should be no reason why a hydrogen bond would not be formed. When I asked my teacher about this, he did not give a clear answer as to why there wouldn't be a hydrogen bond.
He kept saying that hydrogen bonds can only be formed between polar groups in helical polypeptides. The thing that's confusing me with this explanation is the fact that according to him, the same polar groups that he's saying would not form hydrogen bonds in a dipeptide, would do so in a helical polypeptide. To my understanding the position of a charged atom in relation to another charged atom will not effect the existence of the attraction, only the its strength. What I mean is that if it is established that certain groups form a hydrogen bond, they will do so regardless of their positions in relation to one another (as long as the distance between them is roughly the same, the bond would of course be negligible if the distance was great enough.) But I don't exactly understand why it'd make any difference if the atoms in question were in neighboring amino acids in a dipeptide, or in "opposite" amino acids in a helical polypeptide. ( With "opposite" amino acids I refer to the amino acids that are opposite to each other in a helical structure)
And again, thanks for the responses, I really appreciate you helping me out!