First I would like to thank you guys, the two replies show that you care enough to give me such straight answers. It’s very good advice actually, I am an economist by education.
When I finished the initial post I was afraid I would receive such answers. The reason it looks so “naive” it’s because it’s the first post and I had a lot of questions and I tried to keep my post short. Also it’s the first time that I’ve been talking about my idea.
This is not an idea I had a week ago, I’m actually dreaming of having my own business in this domain for several years now. And I will tell you why: if I produce 100 g of tungsten carbide , 100 nm, 99%, it’s the same product with 100 g of tungsten carbide , 100 nm, 99% produced by BASF. If I were to produce 10 T-shirts, they would not be the same product with 10 T-shirts produced by Versace or Armani.
Curioscat I think that if one wants to start a garage type business , he should start with products that have a large market, not look for niche market because it’s high risk business. If one can survive with the same margin profit percentage and equal product price as the large competitors do (or even smaller) one has a chance (at equal expenses costs percentage). The economical profile of Romania gives me some leverage though: smaller energy costs, smaller personnel costs and I dare to say smaller raw material costs; and because Romania is in the European Union I have access to a large market.
Also starting with high value / kg products, means less costs with personnel or plant size or initial investment in production equipment.
I don’t mind going bankrupt with a business or two as long as I have contact with the market and the lost money are money that I can afford to lose.
I will reformulate my questions:
- can somebody help me with a link that contains similar content to this one, but free:
http://www.bccresearch.com/report/advanced-ceramics-nanoceramic-powders-nan015f.html?tab=highlight&highlightKeyword=Advanced+Ceramics+Nanoceramic+Powders- let’s say I’m an amateur chemist who wants to produce 100 g of tungsten carbide powder , 10 μm , 99 %. What would you recommend me, should I try to produce WC by wolfram reaction with carbon at 1400 degrees C and then milling it to size, or should I try to produce it by vapor phase reaction directly at the desired size? Which is more cost effective (initial investment + production costs).
PS there is a lot to comment about “industrialized” Romania
. But that’s a different looooong post