[Borek]

Did I miss any

SMILES at Daylight site
http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smiles.html
SMILES at wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMILES
ChemSketch
http://www.acdlabs.com/download/
LaTeX
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Mathematics)

I believe it is a good starting collection, at least for the forum. There is much more to LaTeX, but most of it is of no use for us.

[billnotgatez]

Just smiles testing some ketones



or





Just smiles testing some acids







or

[billnotgatez]

Just playing with tex

[tex] \frac {(2)}{(4)} = \frac {(1)}{(2)} [/tex]

[tex] \frac {(P_1 . V_1)}{(n_1 . T_1)} = \frac {(P_2 . V_2)}{(n_2 . T_2)} [/tex]

[Xenonman]

Zn_(s) + 2 HCl_(ac) H_{2 (g)} + ZnCl_{2 (ac)}

Zn⁺²_(ac) + Y^-4_(ac)  [ZnY]^-2_(ac)

n_Zn+2=n_Y-4= 0.0011 mol

Don't mind me. Just me failing at making divisions in tex.
Yes, I wrote states as subscripts. That's the way it's done around here.

[Borek]

Yes, I wrote states as subscripts. That's the way it's done around here.

There is no such thing as "here" here.

IUPAC rules are clear and they are defined to be used by everyone.

[curiouscat]

Yes, I wrote states as subscripts. That's the way it's done around here.

Around here is where?

[curiouscat]

IUPAC rules are clear and they are defined to be used by everyone.

Yes the rules are clear but how does one mandate everyone to use them?

[Borek]

IUPAC rules are clear and they are defined to be used by everyone.

Yes the rules are clear but how does one mandate everyone to use them?

Technically you don't, but it is a matter of being clear and unambiguous. What is VO2+? IUPAC rules tell you how to write it in an unambiguous way, why not stick to them?

[curiouscat]

Technically you don't, but it is a matter of being clear and unambiguous. What is VO2+? IUPAC rules tell you how to write it in an unambiguous way, why not stick to them?

Agreed.

[billnotgatez]

(ac)
I did a quick GOOGLE and did not find this one
I have yet to peruse the IUPAC rules

[Borek]

No such thing as (ac) as far as I am aware.

http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=8373.msg38043#msg38043

[Xenonman]

_(ac) comes from "acuoso", aqueous in Spanish. I used it all over my Olympiad exams, without any penalization, because the entire exam was in Spanish.

Those zinc equations were for an assignment. In Spanish again.

I was taught to use _(ac), as you can see. This is what every future Olympic will be taught, so I'll try to show this discrepancy, and an example of what happens when they use _(ac) instead of (aq). I'll use (aq) as long as I don't forget when posting here, also.

[billnotgatez]

Some more practice

Cobalt(II) oxide
WIKI

SPIDER


Cobalt(III) oxide
SPIDER


Cobalt(II,III) oxide
WIKI

SPIDER


Cobalt(II) carbonate
SPIDER

[billnotgatez]

testing

Glycerol or Glycerin C₃H₈O₃
WIKI

SPIDER

[Borek]

Strange. Why C(C(CO)O)O when OCC(O)CO is much simpler? Perhaps wiki has some computer generated code.