November 16, 2024, 01:08:20 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Combustion of a hydrocarbon  (Read 5379 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« on: March 24, 2013, 12:01:29 PM »
15 ml of a gaseous hydrocarbon are mixed with 120 ml oxygen and ignited. After the reaction, the burned gases are shaken with concentrated aqueous KOH solution. A part of the gases is completely absorbed while 67.5 ml gases remain. It has the same temperature and pressure as the original unburned mixture. What is the chemical formula of the hydrocarbon used for the experiment?

15 CxHy + 15(x+y/4) O2 :rarrow: 15x CO2 + 15y/2 H2O
The starting volume was 135 ml. The decrease in volume is (assuming water is in gas state): 15+15x+15y/4+15x-15y/2, so i have:
135 - (15+15x+15y/4+15x-15y/2) = 67.5
For y=2, x=2, therefore it is acetylene, but in the answer it is ethane. Did I made a mistake somewhere, or is their answer wrong?

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3653
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2013, 12:41:17 PM »
15 ml of a gaseous hydrocarbon are mixed with 120 ml oxygen and ignited. After the reaction, the burned gases are shaken with concentrated aqueous KOH solution. A part of the gases is completely absorbed while 67.5 ml gases remain. It has the same temperature and pressure as the original unburned mixture. What is the chemical formula of the hydrocarbon used for the experiment?

15 CxHy + 15(x+y/4) O2 :rarrow: 15x CO2 + 15y/2 H2O
The starting volume was 135 ml. The decrease in volume is (assuming water is in gas state): 15+15x+15y/4+15x-15y/2, so i have:
135 - (15+15x+15y/4+15x-15y/2) = 67.5
For y=2, x=2, therefore it is acetylene, but in the answer it is ethane. Did I made a mistake somewhere, or is their answer wrong?

Are you sure that the oxygen was not in excess?

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2013, 12:49:24 PM »
I also get ethane.

1. Write an expression for the change in volume due to combustion alone (before KOH treatment).
2. Write an equation for the change in volume due to KOH treatment (after combustion).
3. The total volume change is the sum of 1. and 2.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2013, 12:57:06 PM »
Combustion alone:
135-15-15x-15y/4+15y/2=z
z-15x=67.5

135-15-15x-15y/4+15y/2-15x=67.5 same equation as in my original post. I don't understand  ???.

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2013, 01:50:28 PM »
What is z?

The change in volume due to combustion = -(volume of hyrocarbon)-(volume of reacting oxygen)+(volume of CO2 and water)
The change in volume due to KOH treatment = -(volume of CO2 and water)

Therefore:

The overall change in volume = -(volume of hyrocarbon)-(volume of reacting oxygen)+(volume of CO2 and water)-(volume of CO2 and water) = 67.5-135 mL
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Rutherford

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
  • Mole Snacks: +60/-29
  • Gender: Male
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2013, 01:57:38 PM »
Okay, saw now where was my mistake. I wrote that CO2 volume was only lost, but I didn't write that it was firstly produced, so it cancels out. For water, I wrote the opposite. It is ethane then. Thanks for the help.


Offline Needaask

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 186
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-16
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2013, 01:26:07 AM »
I assumed that the H2O would liquify. So the change in volume=67.5-135=-67.5=-15-15x-15y/4
And since the carbon dioxide and water adds up to 67.5, 15x+15y/2=67.5

So equation (1): 15x+15y/4=52.5
and eqn (2): 15x+15y/2=67.5

so y=4 and x=2.5 what went wrong for me here?

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2013, 03:19:40 AM »
the carbon dioxide and water adds up to 67.5

Why/how?
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Needaask

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 186
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-16
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2013, 05:35:20 AM »
the carbon dioxide and water adds up to 67.5

Why/how?

Sorry it shouldn't be 67.5ml I forgot about the mole ratio and volume of gases rule. But then now I can't think of another equation with x and y to solve the simultaneous equation with..

Thanks for the help :)

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2013, 07:05:00 AM »
But then now I can't think of another equation with x and y to solve the simultaneous equation with..

Neither can I, but eq 1:

15x + 15y/4 = 52.5

4x + y = 14

By inspection there are 3 solutions where x > 0 < y:

x = 1; y = 10
x = 2; y = 6
x = 3; y = 2

The only solution that makes chemical sense is x = 2; y = 6 (ethane)
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Needaask

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 186
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-16
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2013, 07:26:36 AM »
But then now I can't think of another equation with x and y to solve the simultaneous equation with..

Neither can I, but eq 1:

15x + 15y/4 = 52.5

4x + y = 14

By inspection there are 3 solutions where x > 0 < y:

x = 1; y = 10
x = 2; y = 6
x = 3; y = 2

The only solution that makes chemical sense is x = 2; y = 6 (ethane)

Oh we are supposed to find that out this way? I didn't expect that.

But actually when doing this we assumed the excess reagent was the oxygen, but shouldn't we be able to assume that the hydrocarbon is the excess reagent too?

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2013, 08:02:59 AM »
If O2 was the limiting reagent, then all the O2 would be consumed - i.e. the change in volume would have to be >120 mL. The fact that this is not true unambiguously indicates that O2 is in excess.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Needaask

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 186
  • Mole Snacks: +6/-16
Re: Combustion of a hydrocarbon
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2013, 01:48:17 PM »
If O2 was the limiting reagent, then all the O2 would be consumed - i.e. the change in volume would have to be >120 mL. The fact that this is not true unambiguously indicates that O2 is in excess.

Oh that's right! If it was the excess all of it would be used up and only some CxHy would be left behind. So the remaining volume has to be >15ml?

Sponsored Links