first of all, NaK-tartrate doesn't quench your initial reaction product: it's just a "helper for later"
second, in an ideal situation, you don't have no more LiAlH
4 molecules around at all when you beginn quenching (as they'd been consumed by the very reaction you introduced them for in the first place - except of the usual small excess, that is)
third, the core of "quenching" is the reaction of (usually) water with the (for example) aluminium alcoholates you generated during reduction (here shown with a ketone):
R
2C=O + [AlH
4]
- [ (R
2CH-O-)
4 Al ]
-[ (R
2CH-O-)
4 Al ]
- + 4 H
2O
4 R
2CHOH + Al(OH)
3 + OH
-in a related process, excess LiAlH
4 (and "partially used" LAH) would be hydrolyzed:
Li[AlH
4] + 4 H
2O
LiOH + Al(OH)
3 + 4 H
2now, the " Al(OH)
3 " generated is a pretty slimy stuff (in fact it is a bunch of substances, and most of them next to completely insoluble in your matrix), with a lot of disadvantages to your workup, including that it might encapsulate a lot of yet unhydrolyzed material, thereby preventing it from finishing hydrolysis.
this is not what chemists dream of
those of us not-so-faint-at-heart hence would perform the workup with, for example, more or less concentrated " aq. HCl on ice " , hence preventing the slime from forming at all:
"Al(OH)
3 " , insoluble + excess H
+ Al
3+(aq.) , soluble + H
2O
unfortunately, even if you were the more adventurous type: not all your target substances would stand strong acid conditions combined with some heat evolving.
substances requiring neutral or even alkaline conditions (let's say: acetals) hence could be not worked up with those protocols ...
... and that's where Rochelle's salt comes into play:
tartrates will form (more or less soluble) complexes with aluminium ions even under alkaline conditions, and hence prevent those slimes from forming at all
the complexes formed will look something like this:
(from:
link )
... and thus facilitate the workup big time
regards
Ingo