December 22, 2024, 10:11:17 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Topic: IUPAC Naming  (Read 9702 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
IUPAC Naming
« on: December 08, 2013, 07:04:37 PM »

           C
           |
    C-C-C-C-C
           |
           C
I came up with 3-propylpentane, would that be correct?
Logged

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2013, 07:09:28 PM »
Find the longest carbon chain.
Logged
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2013, 07:11:26 PM »
Sorry about that was suppose to have been 5 in the longest chain.
Logged

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2013, 07:15:13 PM »
OK 5 carbon chain. What about the substituents?
Logged
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
IUPAC
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2013, 07:19:44 PM »
      C
      |
      C
      |
   C-C-C-C-C-C
      |     |
      C    C
      |
      C
      |
      C
     
I came up with 2 propyl 2-butyl 4-ethylhexane, but am unsure if this is correct?
« Last Edit: December 08, 2013, 07:35:50 PM by joshphillips1977 »
Logged

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2013, 07:23:38 PM »
It's on the third carbon (so 3-) and there are 3 substituents (so Prop)...

3-prop
Logged

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2013, 07:26:18 PM »
No, there are two substituents on that carbon.
Logged
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2013, 07:32:05 PM »
Ah so then it would be (2-ethyl 2ethyl)
Logged

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2013, 07:35:15 PM »
No, where do you get ethyl from, there are only two 1 carbon substituents on that middle carbon. If that makes sense.
Logged
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2013, 07:41:08 PM »
kind of so what your saying is I count the one to the left and the one to the right but not the carbon that is in the longest chain. So essentially it would be 2-methyl 2-methyl...
Logged

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2013, 07:42:55 PM »
CCC(C)(C)CC

is 3,3-dimethylpentane
Logged
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2013, 07:47:58 PM »
alright now I am confused
Logged

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2013, 07:49:14 PM »
Why?
Logged
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline Arkcon

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7367
  • Mole Snacks: +533/-147
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #13 on: December 08, 2013, 07:50:56 PM »
joshphillips1977:  I hope you don't mind me merging your two threads on nomenclature.  Once you figure out one, you may have what you need to solve the other.  Sorry if the order is a little screwy for you and everyone else though.
Logged
Hey, I'm not judging.  I just like to shoot straight.  I'm a man of science.

Offline joshphillips1977

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 30
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: IUPAC Naming
« Reply #14 on: December 08, 2013, 07:52:28 PM »
The Dim
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Sponsored Links