October 22, 2024, 03:31:35 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Gas effusion question  (Read 2033 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline supehr

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Gas effusion question
« on: May 09, 2014, 08:08:42 PM »
So in this textbook i encountered this question for gas effusion through an orifice.
I solved it by placing:

?mol O2 in the denominator and 2.2x10-4 in the numerator like it's done in the example because O2 is a heavier gas and will effuse slower and N2 should effuse faster.
But the solution (attached) did it differently. I got 2.5x10-4 and the solutions got 2.1x10-4.

Why did they place oxygen in the numerator, even though it should diffuse slower? Can someone explain it to me. Thank you!

Offline supehr

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Gas effusion question
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2014, 08:09:27 PM »
Oh i am talking about practice example A!

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27815
  • Mole Snacks: +1808/-411
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Gas effusion question
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2014, 03:31:48 AM »
Sanity check: molar mass of oxygen is higher, so it should effuse slower, yet your result suggest more oxygen effused. Something is apparently wrong.

Graham's law is

[tex]\frac {Rate~of~effusion~of~gas_1}{Rate~of~effusion~of~gas_2} = \sqrt{\frac {M_2}{M_1}}[/tex]

It shouldn't matter which gas is which, as long as you are consistent.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline supehr

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Gas effusion question
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2014, 03:44:22 PM »
Oh i see, thus oxygen takes more time and it should be less than one. That makes sense! I needed to re-read the notes didn't quite get it through my head  :-[. Thank you  ;D

Sponsored Links