[FisherNPC]

Can someone talk anything about Application of Mathematics and Physics to Chemistry?Thank you

[Alberto_Kravina]

I don´t know if I understood your question, but I think that the calculation of th pH-value of a solution is an example.

[Albert]

Algebra is useful too: http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?board=4;action=display;threadid=7196

[xiankai]

and the scary math in thermodynamics...

differential equations, calculus, and so on  

[Borek]

Diffusion in electrochemistry is 100% based on differential equations. Concentration changes in time due to kinetics as well.

As for chemistry vs physics - that's not correct question, there is no precise border between both. Is pV=nRT physics or chemistry? Is simulation of NMR spectra chemistry or physics?

[Yggdrasil]

Math is extremely important in physical chemistry especially advanced topics such as quantum or statistical mechanics.  Quantum relies heavily on group theory and linear algebra and requires knowledge of mathematical/physical topics such as Hilbert spaces and Hamiltonian operators.  Stat mech relies heavily on probability theory.

Other fields of chemistry also use a significant amount of math.  For example, most modern IR and NMR spectroscopy machines use the Fourier transform to obtain a spectra.  Even biochemistry has important topics which rely heavily on math, such as binding theory and kinetics, and many techniques (e.g. x-ray crystallography, surface plasmon resonance, etc) involve important concepts from physics.

[tamim83]

Physics is also extremely important in chemistry.  You have to know about physcal concepts like charge, forces, motion, and wave mechanics/quantum theory to study chemistry.  This is why I think that physics should be a prerequisite to chemistry (like general chemistry or high school chemistry).  I think that would be easier than inserting physics lessons into chemistry lessons, we could save a lot of time.  

[Alberto_Kravina]

The calculation of the refractive index of a liquid is another example.

[triethanolamine]

Oh boy you guys. My BS is in math. A+'s in quantum, stat mech, thermodynamics, etc. Here's the way it really is.

1. Higher mathematics --- abstract algebra, linear function theory ---- have application only if by application is meant application to the trivial and useless calculations of theoretical chemists.

2. The bottom line is the so called laws of physics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, were made up to explain far simpler phenomena than organic or bio chemistry.

3. The instrumentation which is indespensible to all areas of chemistry is not the result of calculations by chemical physicists. They can sometimes explain spectra, but the instrument that makes the spectra and the correlation of spectra to structure have developed slowly by trial and error.

4. The one indisputable and indespensile application of physics to chemistry is X-ray crystallography.

[tamim83]

The bottom line is the so called laws of physics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, were made up to explain far simpler phenomena than organic or bio chemistry.

True, but that does not mean that they do not explain some of the phennomena in chemistry.  I am not just talking about the very advanced chemistry hear, but some of concepts encountered in introductory chemistry.  I just do not feel that I should have to teach students about electromagnetic radiation to explain atomic line spectra, at least not in as much detail that is in chemistry textbooks.  That should be "prior knowledge" to some extent.  Same with Kinetic molecular theory, I should not have to go into explanations of elastic and inelastic collisions in as much detail if physics was a prerequiste.   Sure, college level is different because we can assume that students had basic physics.  This is not true for high schoolers, where in most places they have bio, then chem. then physics.  We run into the same problems in biology, the students need an understanding of chemistry to understand biological concepts.  Case in point, physics should be taught before any of the other sciences since it explains some of the very basic workings of the world around us.  Physics is indeed a very fundemental science.  

[Donaldson Tan]

Math is the language of science - chemistry and physics.

[Mitch]

4. The one indisputable and indespensile application of physics to chemistry is X-ray crystallography.

I would of picked NMR.

[Borek]

2. The bottom line is the so called laws of physics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, were made up to explain far simpler phenomena than organic or bio chemistry.

But they obey regardless of the level of complication of the process you are investigating. Protein folding is one of these complicated phenomena - it IS entirely describen by simple laws of physics.

Let me put it this way: there are basic laws of physics that describe whole universe, regardless of whether you speak of your brain cell or a galaxy far, far away (trumpets here). Every other law we use is a kind of emergent properties that can be derived from the very basic interactions mixed with laws of statistic.

[Donaldson Tan]

Case in point, physics should be taught before any of the other sciences since it explains some of the very basic workings of the world around us. Physics is indeed a very fundemental science.

Actually chemistry and physics describes the world around us in 2 different approach. Physics describes the world by examining how different substance interact (excluding chemical change) with each other, while chemistry describes the world by giving us an idea how different substances are made.