hmm i understand..if i use glucose and change the water once a week it will be beter instead of using ice?
No idea what you mean by that, and I am afraid you misunderstood what I wrote.
Glucose is not a cooling agent. All it can do is to lower the freezing point of water, so that it won't freeze in the heat exchanger blocking it (assuming heat exchanger is filled with a water/ice mixture, which won't be ever colder than 0°C).
Sorry to say that, but I feel like you are trying to run without knowing how to walk.
Do you understand how the cooling systems work? They either transfer heat from one place to another (that's how the refrigerator works, it is warm on the back because that's the heat that was removed from the inside), or they consume the heat (that's how ice packs work in the unplugged touristic fridges). In the first case system stops to work once it gets unplugged, in the second case system stops to work once the reaction consuming heat stops (for example ice in the ice pack melts). Liquid nitrogen system would fit the second type - and it will work till the nitrogen boils out (which won't take long, liquid nitrogen has a low temperature, but it doesn't have a large heat capacity). Both systems can (and have to be) described by the heat balance equations, telling you how much heat they can absorb per time unit, how long they can work, what are their limitations. Doesn't look to me like you took any of these into consideration.
You plan to use some cooling system to not let your greenhouse overheat in the Sun, yes? Have you tried to estimate what amount of heat you need to remove from the greenhouse per time unit? Will the 300 mm × 300 mm heat exchanger be large enough?