October 06, 2024, 02:37:45 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?  (Read 2535 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Annna

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?
« on: August 16, 2015, 04:58:11 AM »
Can someone please help me explain why this nucleophilic substitution happens at only one of the two amines  ???


Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2015, 08:53:59 AM »
Think about resonance structures and consider the partial charges on each N.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Annna

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2015, 10:17:21 PM »
This is the only solution I can come up with, but does this makes sense to why there should be a neg. partiel charge on N?


Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2015, 02:30:58 AM »
Think about the conjugation of the exocyclic N lone pairs - one of them is conjugated to an electron withdrawing group.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Annna

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2015, 03:53:05 AM »
Hope this is what you meant, because this makes sense to why its more nucleophilic than the other one!

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Substitution at one amine but not the other.. why?
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2015, 04:14:31 AM »
Hope this is what you meant

Yes - this is how I would rationalize the observed selectivity.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Sponsored Links