September 24, 2024, 12:42:49 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Newman projection  (Read 1687 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline orgo814

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Mole Snacks: +11/-6
Newman projection
« on: October 16, 2015, 09:41:16 PM »
I am trying to draw the most stable conformation of chloromethylamine. I'm having issues drawing this in the form of a Newman protection. Maybe I'm wrong but I believe the lone pair on N would be anti to the C-Cl in the projection due to orbital interactions but is this correct?

Thanks
« Last Edit: October 16, 2015, 10:09:32 PM by butlerw2 »

Offline Kate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-3
  • Gender: Female
Re: Newman projection
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2015, 09:09:47 AM »
Hi.

To do a Newman projection you need at least 2 carbons that will be represented at the center of the projection. Chloromethylamine only has 1 carbon atom. Unless you want to put the nitrogen atom at the center of the projection, but I've never seen it done like that.

Offline clarkstill

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 477
  • Mole Snacks: +77/-4
Re: Newman projection
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2015, 10:31:37 AM »
I don't think it's necessary that both atoms be carbon for a Newman projection - not sure I've seen them with nitrogen before but certainly with sulfur for some chiral auxiliaries.

Butler - you are correct about the arrangement, see attached.

Offline Kate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 197
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-3
  • Gender: Female
Re: Newman projection
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2015, 10:33:53 AM »
Ah ok. Never seen any projection with atoms other than carbon at the center, so I thought that was a requirement. Thanks for the correction.

Sponsored Links