November 27, 2024, 05:25:36 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Poll

Where are you from?

Canada
5 (29.4%)
U.S.
6 (35.3%)
Austria
1 (5.9%)
Poland
1 (5.9%)
U.K.
1 (5.9%)
Australia
1 (5.9%)
Italy
2 (11.8%)

Total Members Voted: 15

Voting closed: May 16, 2006, 06:31:46 PM

Topic: Canadian, Eh?  (Read 47228 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #15 on: April 28, 2006, 02:59:41 AM »
Per liter or gallon?
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2006, 03:01:51 AM »
Per Litre.
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Offline Equi

  • chef de cuisine
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 151
  • Mole Snacks: +20/-11
  • Gender: Male
  • Und nach mir die Sintflut
    • miketionary
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2006, 06:18:28 AM »
Petrol is $1.30 AUS here, by the way we think that is really expensive!
I think the brits pay more than a quid per litre (2 pints? lol) of unleaded and diesel is almost un-affordable/-available. In Austria it is approx. ~1€ per litre of diesel, unleaded and super petrol are even more expensive. The germans top us by another 20 euro-cents due to their eco-taxes on fossil fuels.
I'm not suffering from a mental disease - I'm enjoying it.
miketionary

Offline Alberto_Kravina

  • Assault Chemist
  • Retired Staff
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 608
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-15
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2006, 06:58:20 AM »
Quote
. In Austria it is approx. ~1€ per litre of diesel,
1,15 actually.... gas and disel are both so wicked exopensive now... :(

Offline lemonoman

  • Atmospheric
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 607
  • Mole Snacks: +71/-8
  • Gender: Male
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #19 on: April 28, 2006, 10:34:25 AM »
$1.02 per litre here (Ontario, Canada), which is $3.86 per gallon.

Not bad when comparing to the other prices listed here...

Offline constant thinker

  • mad scientist
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1275
  • Mole Snacks: +85/-45
  • Gender: Male
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2006, 04:30:13 PM »
Every other country uses liters. We Americans just happen to be to lazy to switch to the metric system. Our gas is still cheaper than some of the European countries mainly because of taxes I think. Only like $.20 USD federal I think. Then like every state has a tax on gas also. Either something has to be done about gas prices. They don't look like they'll be going down anytime soon. Hydrogen powered vehicles and nuclear power plants to crank electricity (and H when possible). That may be the way of the future unless fusion power pulls through.

Does anyone know about the current status of the investigations by the U.S. government into record profits of the oil companies?
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' " -Ronald Reagan

"I'm for anything that gets you through the night, be it prayer, tranquilizers, or a bottle of Jack Daniels." -Frank Sinatra

Offline lemonoman

  • Atmospheric
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 607
  • Mole Snacks: +71/-8
  • Gender: Male
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #21 on: April 29, 2006, 12:54:49 PM »
Does anyone know about the current status of the investigations by the U.S. government into record profits of the oil companies?

Yeah.  It's a pile of ****.  ;D

Offline Albert

  • Lonely Wanderer
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1050
  • Mole Snacks: +112/-22
  • Gender: Male
  • Half Decent Pharmaceutical Chemist
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #22 on: April 29, 2006, 04:10:51 PM »
Going back to the theme of the thread, I cannot understand why the Poles haven't voted. ???

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #23 on: April 29, 2006, 07:16:23 PM »
Going back to the theme of the thread, I cannot understand why the Poles haven't voted. ???

Better now?

I was reluctant to vote as results will have nothing to do with the real site statistics.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline P-man

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
  • Mole Snacks: +13/-17
  • Gender: Male
  • Join Smart People for a better future...
    • My Website
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2006, 05:28:08 PM »
Why? I was just seeing who's form where, but mainly comparing the difference between Canadians and Americans...
Pierre.

Fight for the protection of our envrionmenta and habitat: http://www.wearesmartpeople.com

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27862
  • Mole Snacks: +1813/-412
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2006, 06:18:18 PM »
You will know what are numbers of people that voted, not of people that visited the site. And results of every voluntary vote are skewed, as group voting is not identical with the group researched.

That's very basic sociological/statistical knowledge. Selection of representative group for research is very difficult. In the case of forums it is possible (at least in theory) to calculate statistics not for selected group of users, but for whole population. Such results are always most precise, but also usually too expensive to do.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2006, 08:10:37 PM »
What about that geovisitors link that used to be around the site? Didn't that show a map with flags for visitors so you could see where they came from?
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #27 on: April 30, 2006, 08:19:32 PM »
Yeah, I got rid of it to make the forums run even faster. I can always add it if people want it back though.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline constant thinker

  • mad scientist
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1275
  • Mole Snacks: +85/-45
  • Gender: Male
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #28 on: May 01, 2006, 04:43:19 PM »
I thought it was a cool thing to see where people were from and how people were spread out.

Hey Mitch do you have the ability to see statistics about where people are from? If you do/can get it easily it would be cool if you posted it.
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' " -Ronald Reagan

"I'm for anything that gets you through the night, be it prayer, tranquilizers, or a bottle of Jack Daniels." -Frank Sinatra

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Canadian, Eh?
« Reply #29 on: May 01, 2006, 10:51:37 PM »
This is the forum stats I use. Click through it. http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=sm3mitchandre
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Sponsored Links