November 25, 2024, 11:18:58 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Question on Equivalence Point  (Read 2016 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline galpinj

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 102
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-5
Question on Equivalence Point
« on: October 28, 2016, 06:17:28 PM »
Hello folks,

quick question on equivalence point. I was working through some problems and ran into a conceptual issue.

The question was: "When titrating the monoprotic acid HCl with NaOH of a known concentration, which of the following must be equal at the equivalence point?"

The two answers I narrowed it down to were:
A.Initial moles of HCl are equal to the moles of OH- added
B.Concentrations of [Na+] and [Cl-] are equal

A is correct

I was familiar with A, as I have read similar statements in my textbook; however, I couldn't explain why option B. is wrong. At equivalence point, an equal amount of OH- and H+ will be present. Obviously, the titrant was added as NaOH to the analyte (HCl). As such, wouldn't there be an equimolar amount of Cl- and Na+? Furthermore, given that they will be in the same solution (after the titrant has been added), they should have the same concentration.

Why is B incorrect?

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7976
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Question on Equivalence Point
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2016, 06:37:25 PM »
Indicators (eg methyl orange) may contain some Na+ ions.
In precise electrochemical titrations very often some amount of salt (ie NaNO3) may be added to obtain ionic strength 0.1.
AWK

Offline galpinj

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 102
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-5
Re: Question on Equivalence Point
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2016, 09:40:43 PM »
Indicators (eg methyl orange) may contain some Na+ ions.
In precise electrochemical titrations very often some amount of salt (ie NaNO3) may be added to obtain ionic strength 0.1.

Ah, I see. Thanks!

Sponsored Links