[cattishpoet]

Is this the right molecule drawing of caffeine?
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQxmgdJ6ZK4LyUQBoq3RQNuu9Qwm0MADDIB8LNJfJdUTAj6RmTr_A
If not, what's wrong about it?

[Hunter2]

Its ok.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine

[cattishpoet]

Its ok.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffeine

i've seen a few different drawings and some of'em say H3C
instead of the CH3 on the left lower corner. Does that make any difference? Oh, and in some of'em, small part is on right and the larger part is on left (i'm pretty bad at chemistry as you can tell), what about that?

[Hunter2]

It doesnt matter if you write CH₃ or H₃C you can turn the molecule so its also ok to have the bigger part left or right or on top or bottom.

[cattishpoet]

It doesnt matter if you write CH₃ or H₃C you can turn the molecule so its also ok to have the bigger part left or right or on top or bottom.

Alrighty, thank you so much 

[RedViper9]

The nit picky response:
On the left hand side, it looks like the N-CH₃ bond is going to the H₃ rather than the C, which is a typo.

[Arkcon]

The nit picky response:
On the left hand side, it looks like the N-CH₃ bond is going to the H₃ rather than the C, which is a typo.

Re-read the whole thread.

[AWK]

The nit picky response:
On the left hand side, it looks like the N-CH₃ bond is going to the H₃ rather than the C, which is a typo.

Chemists (sometimes programs) draw molecules in a such inelegant mode.

[RedViper9]

Re-read the whole thread.

Yes? What is it that I've misinterpreted? Whether you write the group as CH₃ or H₃C is not relevant, the bond should connect to the carbon atom. As written, the structure is easily understood, but can be drawn better, which was the original question of the thread.