Hello Everyone,
We are trying to make a vinylsulfone with two carboxylic acids for enzyme inhibition studies (compound 2 to 3 in attached scheme). We can tolerate a final product that has a slow decomposition in water near neutrality in such studies. While researching deprotection of methyl esters in the third edition of Philip Kocienski's book Protecting Groups, I notinced Schemes 6.9 and 6.10 (p. 399). In two cases in which there was a single sp3 carbon between the carboxylic acid and the sulfone, there was decarboxylation. In one case tetramethylammonium acetate n HMPA at 100 degrees did this chemistry, and in the other cesium benzenethiolate in DMF at 85 °C did this chemistry. It is curious that the conditions are not particularly acidic. It is also curious that the solvents are dipolar aprotic (I vaguely recall some early bioorganic studies on a derivative of thiamine pyrophosphate, in which decarboxylation was accelerated by solvent, which I can look up if anyone is interested). In looking over this section of the book, I see other examples of decarboxylations that follow nucleophilic attack on the methyl group of a carboxylate ester in a beta-relationship to a carbonyl group.
The second line of evidence that suggests that decarboxylation might be a problem is that we saw some decarboxylation in a different attempted synthesis of the final compound (1 to 3), one that yielded a mixture of products. We have an intervening carbon that is sp2 hybridized, as opposed to the examples in the book on protecting groups. We don't have a choice of deprotection conditions chosen yet. The deprotection must avoid not only decarboxylation but also nucleophilic addition into the vinylsulfone. My question is how serious the problem of decarboxylation is likely to be in our case.