December 26, 2024, 11:14:17 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Magnetic and chemical (in)equivalence  (Read 2767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tulip11

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Magnetic and chemical (in)equivalence
« on: May 07, 2018, 09:21:34 AM »
I'm trying to draw the P31 NMR for diphosphine in terms of tree splitting diagrams and coupling constants etc but am getting confused as when I look at it it appears the two phosphorous are chemically equivalent but magnetically inequivalent. When I take phosphorous and compare it to a probe nuclei (circled H in image) one phosphorous displays 2J coupling and the other 3J. I thought that this meant they were inequivalent and so would produce a second order spectrum and that tree diagrams would not work but must be misunderstanding something. I would be very grateful if someone could explain this.

Offline Babcock_Hall

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5715
  • Mole Snacks: +331/-24
Re: Magnetic and chemical (in)equivalence
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2018, 11:24:55 AM »
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja00959a010
I am not sure why you think that you must be misunderstanding something; the two phosphorus nuclei do not look magnetically equivalent to me.  In a paper by Mesmer and Carroll, "The kinetics and mechanism of the hydrolysis of pyrophosphite, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88 (7), pp 1381–1387
DOI: 10.1021/ja00959a010, there is a discussion and a figure of a not entirely dissimilar system.

Sponsored Links