Another potential explanation that I would like your feedback on is about the spectator Na+ ions in solution.
Good thinking.
My thinking is that they might have also been transferred into the 20mL portion of the buffer solution.
They were definitely transferred, you can't transfer solution without all of its constituting components.
And less H+ ions might be present in the 20mL portion than in the original 50mL buffer solution that might have led to a +1 pH increase in the pH reading.
Bad thinking. While you are perfectly right that the amount of H
+ present in 20 mL is lower than the amount of H
+ in 50 mL, it doesn't matter, as you are measuring concentration - and concentration is an intensive property, identical for every sample of the given solution.
Comments or critiques on this idea of mine?
Back to good thinking - pH electrodes are sensitive not only to H
+, but also to other cations, especially those small, with a single charge (Li
+, Na
+). These cation always make the electrode show pH that is a bit lower than in reality, this is called a sodium error (or alkaline error), compare
http://www.ph-meter.info/pH-electrode-selectivity . For most commercial pH electrodes alkaline error shouldn't change the reading by more than few hundreds of a unit though, so it is still not enough to explain your result, but you may ask lab assistant (or whoever was responsible for the experiment preparation) for the electrode specification (or the electrode type and maker, every serious model should have the specification available on the web). Knowing selectivity coefficient estimating possible error should be trivial.